Huawei MatePad 11.5 S vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
70
out 100
VS
53
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Manufactured in May, 2024, with display 11.5 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 9000WL, vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE, Manufactured in September, 2023with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
- Larger display: 11.5in
- Higher pixel density: 291ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 8800mAh vs 8000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.0 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
- Lighter design: 478g vs 510g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | n/a | - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.5 in | 11 in |
| Resolution | 1840x2800 pixels | 1200x1920 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 291 ppi | 207 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | n/a | No |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes HDR10 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1 % | 82.2 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 97.4 % | 93.1 % |
| Response time | 23 ms | 37 ms |
| Contrast | 516:1 | 1689:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 261 mm (10.28 in) | 255.53 mm (10.06 in) |
| Width | 177.2 mm (6.98 in) | 167.08 mm (6.58 in) |
| Thickness | 6.2 mm (0.24 in) | 7.36 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 510 g (17.99 oz) | 478 g (16.86 oz) |
| Area | 462 cm² (71.61 in²) | 427 cm² (66.19 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray - Purple |
- Gray - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 9000WL | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
| Max Frequency | 2490 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | n/a | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | n/a | - 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
| Process | n/a | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | n/a | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | n/a | Adreno 610 |
| GPU Cores | n/a | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 1114 MHz |
| FLOPS | n/a | 284 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1241 | 412 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3882 | 1423 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 2591 | 348 |
| CPU | 213665 | 91109 |
| GPU | n/a | 40869 |
| Memory | 148262 | 68964 |
| UX | 148835 | 78274 |
| NanoReview Score | 510762 | 279216 |
| Writing score | n/a | 9238 |
| Web score | n/a | 6619 |
| Video editing | n/a | 3677 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 5908 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 6945 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | n/a | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.2 | Android 13 |
| OS Size | n/a | 22 GB |
| UI Skin | n/a | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 8800 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 225 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 60 min) | Yes (24% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:00 h | 2:45 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 10:41 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 12:28 h |
| Games | n/a | 06:20 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 183 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | n/a |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Matrix | 4608x3456 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/5.0" |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.0 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | May, 2024 yr | August, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2024 yr | September, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 399 | 249 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Accelerometer |
| Charger Included | Yes 22 W | Yes 18 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Huawei MatePad 11.5 S the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
