Huawei MatePad 12 X vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2020)
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei MatePad 12 X Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 12 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin T90A, vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2020), Manufactured in May, 2020with chipsetSamsung Exynos 9611. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei MatePad 12 X
- Larger display: 12in
- Higher pixel density: 279ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 10100mAh vs 7040mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2020)
- Lighter design: 467g vs 555g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 12 in | 10.4 in |
| Resolution | 2800x1840 pixels | 1200x2000 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 5:3 |
| Pixel density | 279 ppi | 224 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (30-144 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1000 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8 % | 81.6 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 99.6 % | 94.5 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 81970 Hz |
| Response time | 21 ms | 36 ms |
| Contrast | 1122:1 | 1734:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 270 mm (10.63 in) | 244.5 mm (9.63 in) |
| Width | 183 mm (7.2 in) | 154.3 mm (6.07 in) |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm (0.23 in) | 7 mm (0.28 in) |
| Weight | 555 g (19.58 oz) | 467 g (16.47 oz) |
| Area | 494 cm² (76.57 in²) | 377 cm² (58.44 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Green |
- Gray - Blue - Pink |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
| Max Frequency | 2490 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | n/a | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | n/a | - 4/1.7 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A73) |
| Process | n/a | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 10 nm |
| Neural Processor | n/a | Yes |
| Graphics | n/a | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU Cores | n/a | 54 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 1053 MHz |
| FLOPS | n/a | 113.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1229 | 372 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3987 | 1178 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 1456 |
| CPU | 293566 | 70076 |
| GPU | 171805 | 55712 |
| Memory | 226709 | 60670 |
| UX | 160938 | 59901 |
| NanoReview Score | 853018 | 246359 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 36.7 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 61 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 5 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 896 |
| Writing score | n/a | 7178 |
| Web score | n/a | 4923 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5061 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 4815 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 6104 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.2 | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| OS Size | 30 GB | 14.9 GB |
| UI Skin | n/a | OneUI 5.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 10100 mAh | 7040 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 66 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 70 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:50 h | 2:45 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 09:49 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 14:28 h |
| Games | n/a | 06:18 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 133 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | n/a |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.0 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Matrix | 4608x3456 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/5.0" |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | n/a | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | n/a | 1 |
| SIM Type | No | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 6.0 | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | September, 2024 yr | April, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | May, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 549 | 349 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 66 W | Yes 8 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Huawei MatePad 12 X the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0