Huawei MatePad Air (2025) vs Infinix Xpad 20
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei MatePad Air (2025) Manufactured in August, 2025, with display 12 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 8020, vs Infinix Xpad 20, Manufactured in June, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G88. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei MatePad Air (2025)
- Larger display: 12in
- Higher pixel density: 279ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 10100mAh vs 7000mAh
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Infinix Xpad 20
- Lighter design: 498g vs 555g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12 in | 11 in |
| Resolution | 2800x1840 pixels | 1200x1920 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 279 ppi | 206 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 1000 nits | 440 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8 % | 80.5 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 270 mm (10.63 in) | 257.7 mm (10.15 in) |
| Width | 183 mm (7.2 in) | 169.2 mm (6.66 in) |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm (0.23 in) | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 555 g (19.58 oz) | 498 g (17.57 oz) |
| Area | 494 cm² (76.57 in²) | 436 cm² (67.58 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | n/a |
| Frame | Metal | n/a |
| Colors | - White - Gray - Green - Pink |
- Gray - Green - Red - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 8020 | MediaTek Helio G88 |
| Max Frequency | 2285 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.3 () - 3/2.05 () |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | SMIC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Da Vinci | MediaTek APU |
| Graphics | Maleoon 920 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 1024 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 840 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1720.3 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1332 | 439 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3979 | 1455 |
| CPU | 427889 | 88293 |
| GPU | 550104 | 40180 |
| Memory | 202772 | 76933 |
| UX | 130640 | 69361 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | HarmonyOS 5.0 | Android 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 10100 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 66 W | 10 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | No |
| Full Charge Time | 1:25 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Matrix | 4608x3456 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
|
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 6.0 | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | August, 2025 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2025 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
Accelerometer |
| Charger Included | Yes, 66 W | Yes, 10 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Huawei MatePad Air (2025) the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0