Huawei MatePad SE 11 vs Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei MatePad SE 11 Manufactured in July, 2024, with display 11 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs Huawei MatePad 11.5 S, Manufactured in May, 2024with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 9000WL. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei MatePad SE 11
- Lighter design: 475g vs 510g
Reasons to choose Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
- Larger display: 11.5in
- Higher pixel density: 291ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 8800mAh vs 7700mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5.1
- Supports newer USB: 3.0 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11 in | 11.5 in |
| Resolution | 1200x1920 pixels | 1840x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 3:2 |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 291 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | n/a |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9 % | 85.1 % |
| sRGB gamut | 98 % | 97.4 % |
| Response time | 26 ms | 23 ms |
| Contrast | 1537:1 | 516:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 252.3 mm (9.93 in) | 261 mm (10.28 in) |
| Width | 163.8 mm (6.45 in) | 177.2 mm (6.98 in) |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm (0.27 in) | 6.2 mm (0.24 in) |
| Weight | 475 g (16.76 oz) | 510 g (17.99 oz) |
| Area | 413 cm² (64.02 in²) | 462 cm² (71.61 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue |
- Silver - Gray - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | HiSilicon Kirin 9000WL |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2490 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | n/a |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
n/a |
| Process | TSMC | n/a |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | n/a |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | n/a |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 128 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1260 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 319.2 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 460 | 1241 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1489 | 3882 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 2591 |
| CPU | 96022 | 213665 |
| GPU | 39091 | n/a |
| Memory | 114989 | 148262 |
| UX | 84671 | 148835 |
| NanoReview Score | 334773 | 510762 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.0 | n/a |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | HarmonyOS 2.0 | HarmonyOS 4.2 |
Battery
| Volume | 7700 mAh | 8800 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 225 W | 225 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 40 min) | Yes (50% in 60 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:00 h | 2:00 h |
| Web Browsing | 11:01 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 14:53 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:27 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 139 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4160x3120 pixels |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.8 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | 2592x1944 pixels | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 720p at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.0 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | July, 2024 yr | May, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2024 yr | May, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 399 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 22 W | Yes 22 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Huawei MatePad 11.5 S the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0