Huawei MatePad SE 11 vs Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025)
53
out 100
VS
74
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei MatePad SE 11 Manufactured in July, 2024, with display 11 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025), Manufactured in August, 2025with chipsetHisilicon Kirin 9020. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei MatePad SE 11
- Lighter design: 475g vs 515g
Reasons to choose Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025)
- Larger display: 11.5in
- Higher pixel density: 291ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 8800mAh vs 7700mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5.1
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11 in | 11.5 in |
| Resolution | 1200x1920 pixels | 1840x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 3:2 |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 291 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9 % | 85.1 % |
| sRGB gamut | 98 % | n/a |
| Response time | 26 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1537:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 252.3 mm (9.93 in) | 261 mm (10.28 in) |
| Width | 163.8 mm (6.45 in) | 177.3 mm (6.98 in) |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm (0.27 in) | 6.1 mm (0.24 in) |
| Weight | 475 g (16.76 oz) | 515 g (18.17 oz) |
| Area | 413 cm² (64.02 in²) | 463 cm² (71.77 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue |
- Silver - Gray - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Hisilicon Kirin 9020 |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2285 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
- 4/1.6 (Taishan-Little) - 3/2.15 (TaiShan V120) - 1/2.5 (TaiShan V121) |
| Process | TSMC | SMIC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | Da Vinci |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Maleoon 920 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 1260 MHz | 840 MHz |
| FLOPS | 319.2 GFLOPS | 1720.3 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 460 | 1360 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1489 | 3866 |
| CPU | 96022 | 351901 |
| GPU | 39091 | 278517 |
| Memory | 114989 | 405011 |
| UX | 84671 | 213091 |
| NanoReview Score | 334773 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | n/a |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | n/a |
| Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.0 | n/a |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | HarmonyOS 2.0 | HarmonyOS 5.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 7700 mAh | 8800 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 225 W | 40 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 40 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:00 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 11:01 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 14:53 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:27 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 139 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4160x3120 pixels |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.8 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | 2592x1944 pixels | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 720p at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | July, 2024 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2024 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 22 W | Yes, 0 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025) the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 3
