Lenovo Idea Tab Pro vs Xiaomi Pad 8
76
out 100
VS
88
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Manufactured in January, 2025, with display 12.7 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8300, vs Xiaomi Pad 8, Manufactured in September, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
- Larger display: 12.7in
- Higher battery capacity: 10200mAh vs 9200mAh
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 8
- Higher pixel density: 344ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 485g vs 620g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | LTPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.7 in | 11.2 in |
| Resolution | 1840x2944 pixels | 2136x3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 3:2 |
| Pixel density | 273 ppi | 344 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.8 % | 85.7 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 98.4 % | n/a |
| Response time | 29 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 291.8 mm (11.49 in) | 251.22 mm (9.89 in) |
| Width | 189.1 mm (7.44 in) | 173.42 mm (6.83 in) |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm (0.27 in) | 5.75 mm (0.23 in) |
| Weight | 620 g (21.87 oz) | 485 g (17.11 oz) |
| Area | 552 cm² (85.56 in²) | 436 cm² (67.58 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Green |
- Black - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 3350 MHz | 321 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.35 (Cortex-A715) |
- 2/2.02 (Cortex-A720) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.21 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 780 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP6 | Adreno 825 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | 2355.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1449 | 2110 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4609 | 6823 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 7869 | n/a |
| CPU | 268793 | 448783 |
| GPU | 362615 | 876015 |
| Memory | 291602 | 426634 |
| UX | 250813 | 325733 |
| NanoReview Score | 1173823 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 4266 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 46 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | n/a | HyperOS 3 |
Battery
| Volume | 10200 mAh | 9200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 50 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:20 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 13:21 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 18:05 h | n/a |
| Games | 08:22 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 157 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.06 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.3 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
n/a |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| eSIM Support * | No | n/a |
| Hybrid Slot | No | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | January, 2025 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2025 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 379 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 45 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 8 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
