Lenovo Tab M11 vs Xiaomi Poco Pad
50
out 100
VS
69
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Lenovo Tab M11 Manufactured in April, 2024, with display 11 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G88, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad, Manufactured in May, 2024with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Lenovo Tab M11
- Lighter design: 465g vs 571g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad
- Larger display: 12.1in
- Higher pixel density: 249ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 10000mAh vs 7040mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5.1
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11 in | 12.1 in |
| Resolution | 1200x1920 pixels | 1600x2560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 93.7 % | 83.4 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 99.1 % | n/a |
| Response time | 52 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1078:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 166.31 mm (6.55 in) | 280 mm (11.02 in) |
| Width | 225.26 mm (8.87 in) | 181.85 mm (7.16 in) |
| Thickness | 7.15 mm (0.28 in) | 7.52 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 465 g (16.4 oz) | 571 g (20.14 oz) |
| Area | 375 cm² (58.13 in²) | 509 cm² (78.9 in²) |
| Water resistance | IP52 | n/a |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Green |
- Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G88 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | Adreno 710 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 940 MHz |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 481.3 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 435 | 1020 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1457 | 3012 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 1094 | n/a |
| CPU | 91956 | 208949 |
| GPU | 39543 | 119652 |
| Memory | 67184 | 137831 |
| UX | 79086 | 152455 |
| NanoReview Score | 277769 | 618887 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| OS Size | 18 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | ZUI 15.1 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 7040 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 20 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (29% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:47 h | 2:00 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2/B3/B5/B8 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4(for NA)/B5(B6/B19)/B8 | WCDMA 1/2/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B38/B40/B41/B66/B71) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B71) |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | January, 2024 yr | May, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2024 yr | May, 2024 yr |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | No | Yes 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco Pad the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
