Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (2nd Gen) vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
Compared 2 smartphones : Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (2nd Gen) Manufactured in September, 2022, with display 11.2 with chipsetMediaTek Kompanio 1300T, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1, Manufactured in November, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (2nd Gen)
- Higher pixel density: 267ppi
- Lighter design: 480g vs 610g
- Supports newer USB: 3.0 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
- Larger display: 12.1in
- Higher battery capacity: 12000mAh vs 8200mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.2 in | 12.1 in |
| Resolution | 1536x2560 pixels | 1600x2560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.3 % | 83.5 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 97.8 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 120 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 8 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 263.66 mm (10.38 in) | 279.8 mm (11.02 in) |
| Width | 166.67 mm (6.56 in) | 181.65 mm (7.15 in) |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm (0.27 in) | 7.5 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 480 g (16.93 oz) | 610 g (21.52 oz) |
| Area | 439 cm² (68.05 in²) | 508 cm² (78.74 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray |
- Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 2600 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| CPU Cores | n/a | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | n/a | - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)) - 1/2.7 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)) |
| Process | n/a | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | n/a | Yes |
| Graphics | n/a | Adreno 810 |
| GPU Cores | n/a | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 895 MHz |
| FLOPS | n/a | 458.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 733 | 1229 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1976 | 3197 |
| CPU | 141216 | 306232 |
| GPU | 230482 | 327665 |
| Memory | 113843 | 213580 |
| UX | 128742 | 229615 |
| NanoReview Score | 614283 | n/a |
| Max Surface Temp. | 40.4 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 90 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 25 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 4256 | n/a |
| Writing score | 12615 | n/a |
| Web score | 8669 | n/a |
| Video editing | 6925 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 9850 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 11174 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 23.2 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | n/a | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 8200 mAh | 12000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 20 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (20% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:25 h | 3:00 h |
| Web Browsing | 09:44 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 14:40 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:58 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 125 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 17 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/5.0 (0.2) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.0 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS |
n/a |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | Nano | No |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | September, 2022 yr | November, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2022 yr | November, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 399 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | Yes 20 W | Yes, 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0