Lenovo Tab P12 vs Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
58
out 100
VS
88
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Lenovo Tab P12 Manufactured in July, 2023, with display 12.7 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7050, vs Xiaomi Redmi K Pad, Manufactured in June, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Lenovo Tab P12
- Larger display: 12.7in
- Higher battery capacity: 10200mAh vs 7500mAh
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
- Higher pixel density: 403ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz
- Lighter design: 326g vs 612g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.7 in | 8.8 in |
| Resolution | 1840x2944 pixels | 1880x3008 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 273 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 700 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.6 % | 82.9 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 98.6 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 280300 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 29 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 750:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 293.3 mm (11.55 in) | 205.1 mm (8.07 in) |
| Width | 190.7 mm (7.51 in) | 132 mm (5.2 in) |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm (0.27 in) | 6.5 mm (0.26 in) |
| Weight | 612 g (21.59 oz) | 326 g (11.5 oz) |
| Area | 559 cm² (86.65 in²) | 271 cm² (42.01 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Green |
- Black - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus |
| Max Frequency | 2600 MHz | 3730 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
- 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.73 (Cortex-X925) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 550 | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| Graphics | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 160 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| FLOPS | 686 GFLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 966 | 2657 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2424 | 8298 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 2392 | n/a |
| CPU | 172688 | 652381 |
| GPU | 110178 | 1322761 |
| Memory | 104474 | 521453 |
| UX | 124358 | 511258 |
| NanoReview Score | 511698 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | n/a | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 10200 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 30 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 60 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:35 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 11:04 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 15:15 h | n/a |
| Games | 07:18 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 155 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.06" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | 4128x3096 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.3 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
n/a |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Type | Nano | No |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | July, 2023 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2023 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 349 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 20 W | Yes 67 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi K Pad the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 5
