OnePlus Pad 2 vs Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
79
out 100
VS
92
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : OnePlus Pad 2 Manufactured in August, 2024, with display 12.1 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, vs Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro, Manufactured in May, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon Elite. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose OnePlus Pad 2
- Larger display: 12.1in
- Higher battery capacity: 9510mAh vs 9200mAh
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 344ppi
- Lighter design: 485g vs 584g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
- Fingerprint scanner
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.1 in | 11.2 in |
| Resolution | 2120x3000 pixels | 2136x3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 7:5 | 3:2 |
| Pixel density | 304 ppi | 344 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (30-144 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | 900 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2 % | 85.7 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 268.7 mm (10.58 in) | 251.22 mm (9.89 in) |
| Width | 195.1 mm (7.68 in) | 173.42 mm (6.83 in) |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm (0.26 in) | 5.75 mm (0.23 in) |
| Weight | 584 g (20.6 oz) | 485 g (17.11 oz) |
| Area | 524 cm² (81.22 in²) | 436 cm² (67.58 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray | - Gray - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon Elite |
| Max Frequency | 3300 MHz | 4320 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520) - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4) |
- 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M)) - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 903-1000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2774 GFLOPS | 3379.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2020 | 3180 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5343 | 9610 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 15814 | n/a |
| CPU | 445157 | 525838 |
| GPU | 849333 | 1106299 |
| Memory | 311675 | 486155 |
| UX | 353553 | 452918 |
| NanoReview Score | 1959718 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | OxygenOS 15 | HyperOS 3 |
Battery
| Volume | 9510 mAh | 9200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 67 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (65% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:56 h | 1:30 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:27 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 09:12 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:18 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 125 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| Matrix | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | n/a | Omnivision OV32D |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | 1/3.6 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.61 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 6.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | July, 2024 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2024 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes, 67 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
