OnePlus Pad 2 vs Xiaomi Poco Pad
Compared 2 smartphones : OnePlus Pad 2 Manufactured in August, 2024, with display 12.1 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad, Manufactured in May, 2024with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose OnePlus Pad 2
- Higher pixel density: 304ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad
- Lighter design: 571g vs 584g
- Higher battery capacity: 10000mAh vs 9510mAh
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.1 in | 12.1 in |
| Resolution | 2120x3000 pixels | 1600x2560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 7:5 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 304 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (30-144 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 900 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2 % | 83.4 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 268.7 mm (10.58 in) | 280 mm (11.02 in) |
| Width | 195.1 mm (7.68 in) | 181.85 mm (7.16 in) |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm (0.26 in) | 7.52 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 584 g (20.6 oz) | 571 g (20.14 oz) |
| Area | 524 cm² (81.22 in²) | 509 cm² (78.9 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | n/a |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray | - Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 |
| Max Frequency | 3300 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520) - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Adreno 710 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 903-1000 MHz | 940 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2774 GFLOPS | 481.3 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2020 | 1020 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5343 | 3012 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 15814 | n/a |
| CPU | 445157 | 208949 |
| GPU | 849333 | 119652 |
| Memory | 311675 | 137831 |
| UX | 353553 | 152455 |
| NanoReview Score | 1959718 | 618887 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | OxygenOS 15 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 9510 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 67 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (65% in 30 min) | Yes (29% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:56 h | 2:00 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:27 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 09:12 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:18 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 125 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | n/a | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | n/a | 1 |
| SIM Type | No | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA 1/2/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B71) |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 6.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | July, 2024 yr | May, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2024 yr | May, 2024 yr |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | No | Yes 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider OnePlus Pad 2 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 23