OnePlus Pad 3 vs Infinix Xpad 20
Compared 2 smartphones : OnePlus Pad 3 Manufactured in December, 2024, with display 11.61 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8350, vs Infinix Xpad 20, Manufactured in June, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G88. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose OnePlus Pad 3
- Larger display: 11.61in
- Higher pixel density: 296ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 9520mAh vs 7000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Infinix Xpad 20
- Lighter design: 498g vs 533g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.61 in | 11 in |
| Resolution | 2000x2800 pixels | 1200x1920 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | n/a | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 296 ppi | 206 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 700 nits | 440 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.4 % | 80.5 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 257.8 mm (10.15 in) | 257.7 mm (10.15 in) |
| Width | 189.1 mm (7.44 in) | 169.2 mm (6.66 in) |
| Thickness | 6.3 mm (0.25 in) | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 533 g (18.8 oz) | 498 g (17.57 oz) |
| Area | 487 cm² (75.49 in²) | 436 cm² (67.58 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | n/a |
| Frame | Metal | n/a |
| Colors | - Gray - Green |
- Gray - Green - Red - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | MediaTek Helio G88 |
| Max Frequency | 3350 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.35 (Cortex-A715) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 780 | MediaTek APU |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP6 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1385 | 439 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4230 | 1455 |
| CPU | 284059 | 88293 |
| GPU | 464917 | 40180 |
| Memory | 336911 | 76933 |
| UX | 249235 | 69361 |
| NanoReview Score | 1335122 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 15 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 9520 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 67 W | 10 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | No |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Matrix | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
|
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | December, 2024 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2024 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
Accelerometer |
| Charger Included | Yes 67 W | Yes, 10 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider OnePlus Pad 3 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 23