OnePlus Pad 3 vs Vivo Pad 3 Pro
74
out 100
VS
84
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : OnePlus Pad 3 Manufactured in December, 2024, with display 11.61 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8350, vs Vivo Pad 3 Pro, Manufactured in April, 2024with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose OnePlus Pad 3
- Higher pixel density: 296ppi
- Lighter design: 533g vs 678.9g
- Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Vivo Pad 3 Pro
- Larger display: 13in
- Higher battery capacity: 11500mAh vs 9520mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.61 in | 13 in |
| Resolution | 2000x2800 pixels | 2064x3096 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | n/a | 3:2 |
| Pixel density | 296 ppi | 286 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max brightness | 700 nits | 900 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes HDR10 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.4 % | 87.6 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 257.8 mm (10.15 in) | 289.56 mm (11.4 in) |
| Width | 189.1 mm (7.44 in) | 198.32 mm (7.81 in) |
| Thickness | 6.3 mm (0.25 in) | 6.64 mm (0.26 in) |
| Weight | 533 g (18.8 oz) | 678.9 g (23.95 oz) |
| Area | 487 cm² (75.49 in²) | 574 cm² (88.97 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Green |
- Gray - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 |
| Max Frequency | 3350 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.35 (Cortex-A715) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 780 | MediaTek APU 790 |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP6 | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1385 | 2170 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4230 | 7166 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 15620 |
| CPU | 284059 | 482771 |
| GPU | 464917 | 808450 |
| Memory | 336911 | 388611 |
| UX | 249235 | 325324 |
| NanoReview Score | 1335122 | 2005156 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 15 | OriginOS 4 |
Battery
| Volume | 9520 mAh | 11500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 67 W | 66 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | 4160x3120 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | n/a |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | 3264x2448 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 8.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | December, 2024 yr | March, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2024 yr | April, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 420 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 67 W | Yes 66 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo Pad 3 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 7
