Home Tablet comparison OnePlus Pad Lite and Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 - Which is better?

OnePlus Pad Lite vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1

60 out 100
OnePlus Pad Lite
VS
75 out 100
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
OnePlus Pad Lite
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1

Compared 2 smartphones : OnePlus Pad Lite Manufactured in July, 2025, with display 11 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G100, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1, Manufactured in November, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose OnePlus Pad Lite
  • Lighter design: 530g vs 610g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
  • Larger display: 12.1in
  • Higher pixel density: 249ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 12000mAh vs 9340mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
  • Includes charger

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB		 n/a

Review

Key Specs OnePlus Pad Lite and Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Tablets:
OnePlus Pad Lite
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 11 in 12.1 in
Resolution 1200x1920 pixels 1600x2560 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
Pixel density 207 ppi 249 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max brightness 500 nits n/a
HDR support No Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate 180 Hz 360 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 82.7 % 83.5 %
Features DCI-P3 n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 254.91 mm (10.04 in) 279.8 mm (11.02 in)
Width 166.46 mm (6.55 in) 181.65 mm (7.15 in)
Thickness 7.39 mm (0.29 in) 7.5 mm (0.3 in)
Weight 530 g (18.7 oz) 610 g (21.52 oz)
Area 424 cm² (65.72 in²) 508 cm² (78.74 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors Blue - Gray
- Blue
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
OnePlus Pad Lite
82.7 %
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
83.5 %

Performance

Testing OnePlus Pad Lite and Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Helio G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Max Frequency 2200 MHz 2700 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76)		 - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520))
- 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720))
- 1/2.7 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720))
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 6 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Yes Yes
Graphics Mali-G57 MP2 Adreno 810
GPU Cores 64 256
GPU Frequency 1000 MHz 895 MHz
FLOPS 128 GFLOPS 458.2 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
OnePlus Pad Lite
729
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
1229
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
OnePlus Pad Lite
2031
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
3197
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)7291229
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)20313197
AnTuTu 10
CPU129129306232
GPU65647327665
Memory112440213580
UX114070229615

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 6 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage Capacity128 GB256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Memory Cardn/aMicroSD

Software

OS Android 15 Android 15
UI Skin OxygenOS 15 HyperOS 2.0

Battery

Volume 9340 mAh 12000 mAh
Max Charging Power 33 W 33 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No Yes
Fast Charging Yes Yes (20% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time n/a 3:00 h

Main camera

Matrix 5 MP 8 MP
Photo resolution n/a 3264x2448 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion n/a No
Lenses count Standard: 5 MP Standard: 8 MP
Features
Main lens
Matrix5 MP8 MP
Aperturen/af/2.0
Sensor sizen/a1/4 (0.25)
Pixel sizen/a1.12 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 5 MP 8 MP
Matrix n/a 3264x2448 pixels
Aperture n/a f/2.2
Focal length n/a 17 mm
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size n/a 1/5.0 (0.2)
Pixel size n/a 1.12 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization n/a No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
NFC* No No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*1n/a
SIM TypeNanoNo
SIM ModeDual SIM Standbyn/a
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos n/a Yes

Other

Class Mid-range Mid-range
Announced July, 2025 yr November, 2025 yr
Release Date July, 2025 yr November, 2025 yr
Sensors - Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
Charger Included No Yes, 33 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below