Oppo Pad 2 vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Pad 2 Manufactured in March, 2023, with display 11.61 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9000, vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE, Manufactured in September, 2023with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Pad 2
- Larger display: 11.61in
- Higher pixel density: 296ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 9510mAh vs 8000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
- Lighter design: 478g vs 552g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | LTPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.61 in | 11 in |
| Resolution | 2000x2800 pixels | 1200x1920 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 7:5 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 296 ppi | 207 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 144 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2 % | 82.2 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 93.1 % |
| Response time | n/a | 37 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 1689:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 258.03 mm (10.16 in) | 255.53 mm (10.06 in) |
| Width | 189.39 mm (7.46 in) | 167.08 mm (6.58 in) |
| Thickness | 6.54 mm (0.26 in) | 7.36 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 552 g (19.47 oz) | 478 g (16.86 oz) |
| Area | 489 cm² (75.8 in²) | 427 cm² (66.19 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gold - Gray |
- Gray - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
| Max Frequency | 3050 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A510) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-A710) - 1/3.05 (Cortex-X2) |
- 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 590 | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Mali-G710 MP10 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU Cores | 960 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 848 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1085.4 GFLOPS | 284 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1721 | 412 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4463 | 1423 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 6032 | 348 |
| CPU | 287180 | 91109 |
| GPU | 283861 | 40869 |
| Memory | 172681 | 68964 |
| UX | 200815 | 78274 |
| NanoReview Score | 944537 | 279216 |
| Stability | 92 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 44 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 7464 | n/a |
| Writing score | n/a | 9238 |
| Web score | n/a | 6619 |
| Video editing | n/a | 3677 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 5908 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 6945 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 13 |
| OS Size | 23 GB | 22 GB |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 14 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 9510 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 67 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes (24% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:18 h | 2:45 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 10:41 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 12:28 h |
| Games | n/a | 06:20 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 183 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | n/a |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | 1/5.0" |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
n/a |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | March, 2023 yr | August, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2023 yr | September, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 550 | 249 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Hall Sensor - Accelerometer |
| Charger Included | Yes 67 W | Yes 18 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Pad 2 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0