Oppo Pad 2 vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE

Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Pad 2 Manufactured in March, 2023, with display 11.61 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9000, vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE, Manufactured in September, 2023with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Oppo Pad 2
  • Larger display: 11.61in
  • Higher pixel density: 296ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 9510mAh vs 8000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
  • Lighter design: 478g vs 552g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 4/128 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Oppo Pad 2 and Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type LTPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 11.61 in 11 in
Resolution 2000x2800 pixels 1200x1920 pixels
Aspect ratio 7:5 16:10
Pixel density 296 ppi 207 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No No
Max brightness 500 nits 400 nits
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision Yes HDR10
Touch Sampling Rate 144 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 84.2 % 82.2 %
Features DCI-P3 DCI-P3
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Oppo Pad 2
n/a
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
400 nits
sRGB gamutn/a93.1 %
Response timen/a37 ms
Contrastn/a1689:1

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 258.03 mm (10.16 in) 255.53 mm (10.06 in)
Width 189.39 mm (7.46 in) 167.08 mm (6.58 in)
Thickness 6.54 mm (0.26 in) 7.36 mm (0.29 in)
Weight 552 g (19.47 oz) 478 g (16.86 oz)
Area 489 cm² (75.8 in²) 427 cm² (66.19 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Gold
- Gray
- Gray
- Green
- Purple
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Oppo Pad 2
84.2 %
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
82.2 %

Performance

Testing Oppo Pad 2 and Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
Max Frequency 3050 MHz 2400 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A510)
- 3/2.85 (Cortex-A710)
- 1/3.05 (Cortex-X2)
- 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53))
- 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73))
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 6 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek APU 590 Hexagon 686
Graphics Mali-G710 MP10 Adreno 610
GPU Cores 960 128
GPU Frequency 848 MHz 1114 MHz
FLOPS 1085.4 GFLOPS 284 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Oppo Pad 2
1721
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
412
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Oppo Pad 2
4463
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
1423
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)1721412
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)44631423
Geekbench Compute (GPU)6032348
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Oppo Pad 2
944537
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
279216
CPU28718091109
GPU28386140869
Memory17268168964
UX20081578274
NanoReview Score944537279216
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Oppo Pad 2
7464
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
582
Stability92 %n/a
Graphics Test44 fpsn/a
Graphics Score7464n/a
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Oppo Pad 2
n/a
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
6945
Writing scoren/a9238
Web scoren/a6619
Video editingn/a3677
Data manipulationn/a5908
NanoReview Scoren/a6945

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 4 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 3.1eMMC 5.1
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) Android 13
OS Size 23 GB 22 GB
UI Skin ColorOS 14 HyperOS 1.0

Battery

Volume 9510 mAh 8000 mAh
Max Charging Power 67 W 18 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes (50% in 30 min) Yes (24% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 1:18 h 2:45 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Oppo Pad 2
n/a
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
29:44
Web Browsingn/a10:41 h
Video Playbackn/a12:28 h
Gamesn/a06:20 h
Standby Moden/a183 h

Main camera

Matrix 13 MP 8 MP
Photo resolution 4160x3120 pixels n/a
Flash LED No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion No No
Lenses count Standard: 13 MP Standard: 8 MP
Features
Main lens
Matrix13 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/2.0
Focal length23 mmn/a
Sensor sizen/a1/4.0"
AutofocusPhase autofocusNo
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 5 MP
Aperture f/2.3 f/2.2
Sensor CMOS n/a
Sensor size 1/4.0" 1/5.0"
Pixel size 1.12 μm n/a
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
n/a
NFC* No No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM TypeNoNo
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Oppo Pad 2
n/a
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
88.3 dB

Other

Class Mid-range Budget
Announced March, 2023 yr August, 2023 yr
Release Date March, 2023 yr September, 2023 yr
Launch Price ($) 550 249
Sensors - Hall Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Hall Sensor
- Accelerometer
Charger Included Yes 67 W Yes 18 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Pad 2 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below