Home Tablet comparison Oppo Pad Neo and Honor Pad X9 - Which is better?

Oppo Pad Neo vs Honor Pad X9

60 out 100
Oppo Pad Neo
VS
50 out 100
Honor Pad X9
Oppo Pad Neo
Honor Pad X9

Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Pad Neo Manufactured in January, 2024, with display 11.4 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Honor Pad X9, Manufactured in July, 2023with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Oppo Pad Neo
  • Higher pixel density: 260ppi
  • Higher battery capacity: 8000mAh vs 7250mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5.1
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
  • Includes charger
Reasons to choose Honor Pad X9
  • Larger display: 11.5in
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Lighter design: 499g vs 538g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB		 n/a

Review

Key Specs Oppo Pad Neo and Honor Pad X9
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Tablets:
Oppo Pad Neo
vs
Honor Pad X9

Display

Display quality comparison
Type LTPS LCD TFT LCD
Size 11.4 in 11.5 in
Resolution 1720x2408 pixels 1200x2000 pixels
Aspect ratio 4:3 5:3
Pixel density 260 ppi 203 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max brightness 400 nits 450 nits
HDR support No No
Screen-to-body ratio 83.9 % 84.1 %
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Oppo Pad Neo
n/a
Honor Pad X9
457 nits

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 255.12 mm (10.04 in) 267.3 mm (10.52 in)
Width 188.04 mm (7.4 in) 167.4 mm (6.59 in)
Thickness 6.89 mm (0.27 in) 6.9 mm (0.27 in)
Weight 538 g (18.98 oz) 499 g (17.6 oz)
Area 480 cm² (74.4 in²) 447 cm² (69.29 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors Gray Gray
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Oppo Pad Neo
83.9 %
Honor Pad X9
84.1 %

Performance

Testing Oppo Pad Neo and Honor Pad X9 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Helio G99 Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
Max Frequency 2200 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76)		 - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53)
- 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 6 nm 6 nm
Neural Processor Yes Hexagon 686
Graphics Mali-G57 MP2 Adreno 610
GPU Cores 128 128
GPU Frequency 1000 MHz 1260 MHz
FLOPS 128 GFLOPS 322.6 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Oppo Pad Neo
714
Honor Pad X9
477
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Oppo Pad Neo
1872
Honor Pad X9
1551
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)714477
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)18721551
Geekbench Compute (GPU)1364570
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Oppo Pad Neo], [Honor Pad X9]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Oppo Pad Neo
403782
Honor Pad X9
323692
CPU133099110393
GPU6860540144
Memory10677992324
UX9529980831
NanoReview Score403782323692

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 6 GB 4 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage Capacity128 GB128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Memory CardMicroSDNo

Software

OS Android 13 Android 13
UI Skin ColorOS 13.2 MagicOS 7.1

Battery

Volume 8000 mAh 7250 mAh
Max Charging Power 33 W 225 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes (50% in 50 min) Yes (34% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 2:00 h 2:04 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Oppo Pad Neo
n/a
Honor Pad X9
25:36
Web Browsingn/a08:56 h
Video Playbackn/a11:02 h
Gamesn/a07:03 h
Standby Moden/a155 h

Main camera

Matrix 8 MP 5 MP
Photo resolution n/a 2592x1944 pixels
Zoom n/a Digital
Flash No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion No No
Lenses count Standard: 8 MP Standard: 5 MP
Features
Main lens
Matrix8 MP5 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.2
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 5 MP
Matrix n/a 2592x1944 pixels
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Sensor CMOS n/a
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.1
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
NFC* No No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*11
SIM TypeNanoNano
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

Speakers 4.0 6.0
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No

Other

Class Mid-range Budget
Announced January, 2024 yr July, 2023 yr
Release Date January, 2024 yr July, 2023 yr
Launch Price ($) 260 n/a
Sensors - Hall Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass		 - Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
Charger Included Yes 33 W No
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Pad Neo the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below