Oppo Pad Neo vs OnePlus Pad 3
60
out 100
VS
74
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Pad Neo Manufactured in January, 2024, with display 11.4 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs OnePlus Pad 3, Manufactured in December, 2024with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8350. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Pad Neo
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose OnePlus Pad 3
- Larger display: 11.61in
- Higher pixel density: 296ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 533g vs 538g
- Higher battery capacity: 9520mAh vs 8000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | LTPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.4 in | 11.61 in |
| Resolution | 1720x2408 pixels | 2000x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | n/a |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 296 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 700 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.9 % | 84.4 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 255.12 mm (10.04 in) | 257.8 mm (10.15 in) |
| Width | 188.04 mm (7.4 in) | 189.1 mm (7.44 in) |
| Thickness | 6.89 mm (0.27 in) | 6.3 mm (0.25 in) |
| Weight | 538 g (18.98 oz) | 533 g (18.8 oz) |
| Area | 480 cm² (74.4 in²) | 487 cm² (75.49 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray | - Gray - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 3350 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/2.2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.35 (Cortex-A715) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek APU 780 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G615 MP6 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 714 | 1385 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1872 | 4230 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 1364 | n/a |
| CPU | 133099 | 284059 |
| GPU | 68605 | 464917 |
| Memory | 106779 | 336911 |
| UX | 95299 | 249235 |
| NanoReview Score | 403782 | 1335122 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 13.2 | ColorOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 8000 mAh | 9520 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 50 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:00 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
n/a |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | n/a |
| SIM Type | Nano | No |
| eSIM Support * | No | n/a |
| Hybrid Slot | No | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | n/a |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | January, 2024 yr | December, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2024 yr | December, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 260 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | Yes 67 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider OnePlus Pad 3 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
