Oppo Pad Neo vs Oppo Pad 2

60 out 100
Oppo Pad Neo
VS
75 out 100
Oppo Pad 2

Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Pad Neo Manufactured in January, 2024, with display 11.4 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Oppo Pad 2, Manufactured in March, 2023with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9000. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Oppo Pad Neo
  • Lighter design: 538g vs 552g
Reasons to choose Oppo Pad 2
  • Larger display: 11.61in
  • Higher pixel density: 296ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 9510mAh vs 8000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.2

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Oppo Pad Neo and Oppo Pad 2
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Tablets:
vs

Display

Display quality comparison
Type LTPS LCD LTPS LCD
Size 11.4 in 11.61 in
Resolution 1720x2408 pixels 2000x2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 4:3 7:5
Pixel density 260 ppi 296 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No No
Max brightness 400 nits 500 nits
HDR support No Yes Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate n/a 144 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 83.9 % 84.2 %
Features n/a DCI-P3

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 255.12 mm (10.04 in) 258.03 mm (10.16 in)
Width 188.04 mm (7.4 in) 189.39 mm (7.46 in)
Thickness 6.89 mm (0.27 in) 6.54 mm (0.26 in)
Weight 538 g (18.98 oz) 552 g (19.47 oz)
Area 480 cm² (74.4 in²) 489 cm² (75.8 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors Gray - Gold
- Gray
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Oppo Pad Neo
83.9 %
Oppo Pad 2
84.2 %

Performance

Testing Oppo Pad Neo and Oppo Pad 2 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Helio G99 MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Max Frequency 2200 MHz 3050 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76)
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A510)
- 3/2.85 (Cortex-A710)
- 1/3.05 (Cortex-X2)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 6 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Yes MediaTek APU 590
Graphics Mali-G57 MP2 Mali-G710 MP10
GPU Cores 128 960
GPU Frequency 1000 MHz 848 MHz
FLOPS 128 GFLOPS 1085.4 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Oppo Pad Neo
714
Oppo Pad 2
1721
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Oppo Pad Neo
1872
Oppo Pad 2
4463
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)7141721
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)18724463
Geekbench Compute (GPU)13646032
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Oppo Pad Neo
403782
Oppo Pad 2
944537
CPU133099287180
GPU68605283861
Memory106779172681
UX95299200815
NanoReview Score403782944537
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Oppo Pad Neo
n/a
Oppo Pad 2
7464
Stabilityn/a92 %
Graphics Testn/a44 fps
Graphics Scoren/a7464

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 6 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity128 GB256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 3.1
Memory CardMicroSDNo

Software

OS Android 13 Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14)
OS Size n/a 23 GB
UI Skin ColorOS 13.2 ColorOS 14

Battery

Volume 8000 mAh 9510 mAh
Max Charging Power 33 W 67 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes (50% in 50 min) Yes (50% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 2:00 h 1:18 h

Main camera

Matrix 8 MP 13 MP
Photo resolution n/a 4160x3120 pixels
Flash No LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion No No
Lenses count Standard: 8 MP Standard: 13 MP
Features
Main lens
Matrix8 MP13 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.2
Focal lengthn/a23 mm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.3
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size n/a 1/4.0"
Pixel size n/a 1.12 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
NFC* No No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*1n/a
SIM TypeNanoNo
eSIM Support *Non/a
Hybrid SlotNon/a
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes

Other

Class Mid-range Mid-range
Announced January, 2024 yr March, 2023 yr
Release Date January, 2024 yr March, 2023 yr
Launch Price ($) 260 550
Sensors - Hall Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Hall Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
Charger Included Yes 33 W Yes 67 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Pad 2 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below