Oppo Pad Neo vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
60
out 100
VS
93
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Pad Neo Manufactured in January, 2024, with display 11.4 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S11, Manufactured in September, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Pad Neo
- Larger display: 11.4in
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
- Higher pixel density: 274ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 469g vs 538g
- Higher battery capacity: 8400mAh vs 8000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
- Fingerprint scanner
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 12/128 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | LTPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| Size | 11.4 in | 11 in |
| Resolution | 1720x2408 pixels | 1600x2560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 274 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 1000 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.9 % | 83.6 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 255.12 mm (10.04 in) | 253.8 mm (9.99 in) |
| Width | 188.04 mm (7.4 in) | 165.3 mm (6.51 in) |
| Thickness | 6.89 mm (0.27 in) | 5.5 mm (0.22 in) |
| Weight | 538 g (18.98 oz) | 469 g (16.54 oz) |
| Area | 480 cm² (74.4 in²) | 420 cm² (65.1 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | IP68 |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray | - Silver - Gray |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 3630 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.73 (Cortex-X925) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 714 | 2776 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1872 | 8811 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 1364 | n/a |
| CPU | 133099 | 597252 |
| GPU | 68605 | 1206646 |
| Memory | 106779 | 509734 |
| UX | 95299 | 42811 |
| NanoReview Score | 403782 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | n/a |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 13.2 | One UI 8.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 8000 mAh | 8400 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 50 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:00 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4128x3096 pixels |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.4 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Matrix | n/a | 4000x3000 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | January, 2024 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2024 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 260 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
