Oppo Pad Neo vs Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro
60
out 100
VS
86
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Pad Neo Manufactured in January, 2024, with display 11.4 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro, Manufactured in June, 2024with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Pad Neo
- Lighter design: 538g vs 679g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro
- Larger display: 13in
- Higher pixel density: 286ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 11500mAh vs 8000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | LTPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.4 in | 13 in |
| Resolution | 1720x2408 pixels | 2064x3096 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 286 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 900 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes HDR10 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.9 % | 87.6 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 255.12 mm (10.04 in) | 289.56 mm (11.4 in) |
| Width | 188.04 mm (7.4 in) | 198.32 mm (7.81 in) |
| Thickness | 6.89 mm (0.27 in) | 6.64 mm (0.26 in) |
| Weight | 538 g (18.98 oz) | 679 g (23.95 oz) |
| Area | 480 cm² (74.4 in²) | 574 cm² (88.97 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray | - Silver - Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 3400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.4 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek APU 790 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 714 | 2261 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1872 | 7567 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 1364 | 15782 |
| CPU | 133099 | 509548 |
| GPU | 68605 | 824362 |
| Memory | 106779 | 380749 |
| UX | 95299 | 371079 |
| NanoReview Score | 403782 | 2085738 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 13.2 | OriginOS 4 |
Battery
| Volume | 8000 mAh | 11500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 66 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 50 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:00 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4160x3120 pixels |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
n/a |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | n/a |
| SIM Type | Nano | No |
| eSIM Support * | No | n/a |
| Hybrid Slot | No | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 8.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | January, 2024 yr | May, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2024 yr | June, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 260 | 470 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | Yes 66 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
