Home Tablet comparison Oppo Pad Neo and Xiaomi Pad 7 - Which is better?

Oppo Pad Neo vs Xiaomi Pad 7

60 out 100
Oppo Pad Neo
VS
80 out 100
Xiaomi Pad 7
Oppo Pad Neo
Xiaomi Pad 7

Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Pad Neo Manufactured in January, 2024, with display 11.4 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Xiaomi Pad 7, Manufactured in October, 2024with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Oppo Pad Neo
  • Larger display: 11.4in
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 7
  • Higher pixel density: 344ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Lighter design: 500g vs 538g
  • Higher battery capacity: 8850mAh vs 8000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Infrared port

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB		 - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Oppo Pad Neo and Xiaomi Pad 7
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Tablets:
Oppo Pad Neo
vs
Xiaomi Pad 7

Display

Display quality comparison
Type LTPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 11.4 in 11.2 in
Resolution 1720x2408 pixels 2136x3200 pixels
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Pixel density 260 ppi 344 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No n/a
Max brightness 400 nits 800 nits
HDR support No Yes Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate n/a 360 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 83.9 % 85.7 %
Features n/a DCI-P3

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 255.12 mm (10.04 in) 251.22 mm (9.89 in)
Width 188.04 mm (7.4 in) 173.42 mm (6.83 in)
Thickness 6.89 mm (0.27 in) 6.18 mm (0.24 in)
Weight 538 g (18.98 oz) 500 g (17.64 oz)
Area 480 cm² (74.4 in²) 436 cm² (67.58 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors Gray - Black
- Blue
- Green
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Oppo Pad Neo
83.9 %
Xiaomi Pad 7
85.7 %

Performance

Testing Oppo Pad Neo and Xiaomi Pad 7 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Helio G99 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3
Max Frequency 2200 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76)		 - 3/1.9 (Cortex-A520)
- 4/2.6 (Cortex-A720)
- 1/2.8 (Cortex-X4)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 6 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Yes Yes
Graphics Mali-G57 MP2 Adreno 732
GPU Cores 128 768
GPU Frequency 1000 MHz 950 MHz
FLOPS 128 GFLOPS 1459.2 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Oppo Pad Neo
714
Xiaomi Pad 7
1904
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Oppo Pad Neo
1872
Xiaomi Pad 7
5081
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)7141904
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)18725081
Geekbench Compute (GPU)1364n/a
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Oppo Pad Neo]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Oppo Pad Neo
403782
Xiaomi Pad 7
1373040
CPU133099360403
GPU68605471479
Memory106779307567
UX95299233591
NanoReview Score4037821373040

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 6 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 4200 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity128 GB128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 4.0
Memory CardMicroSDn/a

Software

OS Android 13 Android 15
UI Skin ColorOS 13.2 HyperOS 2.0

Battery

Volume 8000 mAh 8850 mAh
Max Charging Power 33 W 45 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes (50% in 50 min) Yes (50% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 2:00 h 1:20 h

Main camera

Matrix 8 MP 13 MP
Flash No LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No n/a
4K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion No n/a
Lenses count Standard: 8 MP Standard: 13 MP
Features n/a
Main lens
Matrix8 MP13 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.2
Sensor sizen/a1/3.06"
Pixel sizen/a1.12 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.3
Sensor CMOS Omnivision OV08D10
Sensor size n/a 1/4.0"
Pixel size n/a 1.12 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo		 n/a
NFC* No No
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*1n/a
SIM TypeNanoNo
eSIM Support *Non/a
Hybrid SlotNon/a
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

Speakers 4.0 Stereo
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes

Other

Class Mid-range Mid-range
Announced January, 2024 yr October, 2024 yr
Release Date January, 2024 yr October, 2024 yr
Launch Price ($) 260 300
Sensors - Hall Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
Charger Included Yes 33 W Yes 45 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 7 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below