Oppo Pad Neo vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
60
out 100
VS
73
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Pad Neo Manufactured in January, 2024, with display 11.4 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro, Manufactured in September, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Pad Neo
- Higher pixel density: 260ppi
- Lighter design: 538g vs 610g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
- Larger display: 12.1in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 12000mAh vs 8000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | LTPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.4 in | 12.1 in |
| Resolution | 1720x2408 pixels | 1600x2560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.9 % | 83.5 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 255.12 mm (10.04 in) | 279.8 mm (11.02 in) |
| Width | 188.04 mm (7.4 in) | 181.7 mm (7.15 in) |
| Thickness | 6.89 mm (0.27 in) | 7.5 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 538 g (18.98 oz) | 610 g (21.52 oz) |
| Area | 480 cm² (74.4 in²) | 508 cm² (78.74 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray | - Silver - Gray - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)) - 1/2.7 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Adreno 810 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 714 | 1210 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1872 | 3325 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 1364 | n/a |
| CPU | 133099 | 290548 |
| GPU | 68605 | 298705 |
| Memory | 106779 | 185452 |
| UX | 95299 | 161215 |
| NanoReview Score | 403782 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 13.2 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 8000 mAh | 12000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 50 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:00 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 17 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/5.0 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
n/a |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | No |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | January, 2024 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2024 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 260 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | Yes, 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
