Oppo Pad Neo vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE

Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Pad Neo Manufactured in January, 2024, with display 11.4 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE, Manufactured in September, 2023with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Oppo Pad Neo
  • Larger display: 11.4in
  • Higher pixel density: 260ppi
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
  • Lighter design: 478g vs 538g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB
- 4/128 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Oppo Pad Neo and Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type LTPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 11.4 in 11 in
Resolution 1720x2408 pixels 1200x1920 pixels
Aspect ratio 4:3 16:10
Pixel density 260 ppi 207 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No No
Max brightness 400 nits 400 nits
HDR support No Yes HDR10
Screen-to-body ratio 83.9 % 82.2 %
Features n/a DCI-P3
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Oppo Pad Neo
n/a
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
400 nits
sRGB gamutn/a93.1 %
Response timen/a37 ms
Contrastn/a1689:1

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 255.12 mm (10.04 in) 255.53 mm (10.06 in)
Width 188.04 mm (7.4 in) 167.08 mm (6.58 in)
Thickness 6.89 mm (0.27 in) 7.36 mm (0.29 in)
Weight 538 g (18.98 oz) 478 g (16.86 oz)
Area 480 cm² (74.4 in²) 427 cm² (66.19 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors Gray - Gray
- Green
- Purple
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Oppo Pad Neo
83.9 %
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
82.2 %

Performance

Testing Oppo Pad Neo and Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Helio G99 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
Max Frequency 2200 MHz 2400 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76)
- 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53))
- 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73))
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 6 nm 6 nm
Neural Processor Yes Hexagon 686
Graphics Mali-G57 MP2 Adreno 610
GPU Cores 128 128
GPU Frequency 1000 MHz 1114 MHz
FLOPS 128 GFLOPS 284 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Oppo Pad Neo
714
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
412
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Oppo Pad Neo
1872
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
1423
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)714412
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)18721423
Geekbench Compute (GPU)1364348
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Oppo Pad Neo
403782
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
279216
CPU13309991109
GPU6860540869
Memory10677968964
UX9529978274
NanoReview Score403782279216
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Oppo Pad Neo
n/a
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
582
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Oppo Pad Neo
n/a
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
6945
Writing scoren/a9238
Web scoren/a6619
Video editingn/a3677
Data manipulationn/a5908
NanoReview Scoren/a6945

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 6 GB 4 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage Capacity128 GB128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2eMMC 5.1
Memory CardMicroSDMicroSD

Software

OS Android 13 Android 13
OS Size n/a 22 GB
UI Skin ColorOS 13.2 HyperOS 1.0

Battery

Volume 8000 mAh 8000 mAh
Max Charging Power 33 W 18 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes (50% in 50 min) Yes (24% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 2:00 h 2:45 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Oppo Pad Neo
n/a
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
29:44
Web Browsingn/a10:41 h
Video Playbackn/a12:28 h
Gamesn/a06:20 h
Standby Moden/a183 h

Main camera

Matrix 8 MP 8 MP
Flash No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion No No
Lenses count Standard: 8 MP Standard: 8 MP
Features
Main lens
Matrix8 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.0
Sensor sizen/a1/4.0"
AutofocusPhase autofocusNo
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 5 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Sensor CMOS n/a
Sensor size n/a 1/5.0"
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
n/a
NFC* No No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*1n/a
SIM TypeNanoNo
eSIM Support *Non/a
Hybrid SlotNon/a
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Oppo Pad Neo
n/a
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
88.3 dB

Other

Class Mid-range Budget
Announced January, 2024 yr August, 2023 yr
Release Date January, 2024 yr September, 2023 yr
Launch Price ($) 260 249
Sensors - Hall Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Hall Sensor
- Accelerometer
Charger Included Yes 33 W Yes 18 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below