Home Tablet comparison Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 and Xiaomi Poco Pad C1 - Which is better?

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 vs Xiaomi Poco Pad C1

57 out 100
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
VS
59 out 100
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1

Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Manufactured in September, 2025, with display 8.7 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad C1, Manufactured in May, 2026with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
  • Lighter design: 335g vs 406g
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
  • Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
  • Larger display: 9.7in
  • Higher pixel density: 268ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 7600mAh vs 5100mAh
  • Includes charger

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 4/64 GB
- 8/128 GB		 - 4/64 GB
- 6/128 GB

Review

Key Specs Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 and Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Tablets:
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1

Display

Display quality comparison
Type TFT LCD IPS LCD
Size 8.7 in 9.7 in
Resolution 800x1340 pixels 1280x2048 pixels
Aspect ratio 5:3 n/a
Pixel density 179 ppi 268 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes
Max brightness 500 nits 600 nits
HDR support No No
Screen-to-body ratio 81.9 % 87.9 %

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 211 mm (8.31 in) 226.51 mm (8.92 in)
Width 124.7 mm (4.91 in) 147.97 mm (5.83 in)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 in) 7.4 mm (0.29 in)
Weight 335 g (11.82 oz) 406 g (14.32 oz)
Area 263 cm² (40.77 in²) 335 cm² (51.93 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Silver
- Gray		 - Gray
- Blue
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
81.9 %
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
87.9 %

Performance

Testing Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 and Xiaomi Poco Pad C1 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Helio G99 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2
Max Frequency 2200 MHz 2900 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76)		 - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53)
- 4/2.9 (Cortex-A73)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 6 nm 6 nm
Neural Processor Yes Hexagon
Graphics Mali-G57 MP2 n/a
GPU Cores 64 n/a
GPU Frequency 1000 MHz n/a
FLOPS 128 GFLOPS n/a
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
730
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
490
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
2103
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
1512
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)730490
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)21031512
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
n/a
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
511632
CPU127969200538
GPU6607929602
Memory111206114287
UX107944138620
NanoReview Scoren/a511632

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 4 GB 4 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage Capacity64 GB64 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Memory CardMicroSDMicroSD

Software

OS Android 15 Android 16
UI Skin One UI 7.0 n/a

Battery

Volume 5100 mAh 7600 mAh
Max Charging Power 15 W 18 W
Battery Type Li-ion Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes (51% in 60 min) Yes
Full Charge Time 2:28 h n/a

Main camera

Matrix 8 MP 8 MP
Photo resolution n/a 3264x2448 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion No No
Lenses count Standard: 8 MP Standard: 8 MP
Features Bokeh effect
Main lens
Matrix8 MP8 MP
Aperturen/af/2.0
Sensor sizen/a1/4.0 (0.25)
Pixel sizen/a1.12 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 5 MP 5 MP
Aperture n/a f/2.2
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size n/a 1/5.0 (0.2)
Pixel size n/a 1.12 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization No Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS		 n/a
NFC* No No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*1n/a
SIM TypeNanoNo
eSIM Support *YesNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900n/a
3G BandsUMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900)n/a
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B66)n/a
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

3.5 mm Jack Yes Yes
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes n/a

Other

Class Budget Budget
Announced September, 2025 yr May, 2026 yr
Release Date September, 2025 yr May, 2026 yr
Sensors - Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass		 - Proximity Sensor
- Accelerometer
Charger Included No Yes, 18 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below