Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
57
out 100
VS
75
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Manufactured in September, 2025, with display 8.7 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1, Manufactured in November, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
- Lighter design: 335g vs 610g
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
- Larger display: 12.1in
- Higher pixel density: 249ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 12000mAh vs 5100mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 8/128 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 8.7 in | 12.1 in |
| Resolution | 800x1340 pixels | 1600x2560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 179 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.9 % | 83.5 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 211 mm (8.31 in) | 279.8 mm (11.02 in) |
| Width | 124.7 mm (4.91 in) | 181.65 mm (7.15 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 7.5 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 335 g (11.82 oz) | 610 g (21.52 oz) |
| Area | 263 cm² (40.77 in²) | 508 cm² (78.74 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray |
- Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)) - 1/2.7 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Adreno 810 |
| GPU Cores | 64 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 895 MHz |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | 458.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 730 | 1229 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2103 | 3197 |
| CPU | 127969 | 306232 |
| GPU | 66079 | 327665 |
| Memory | 111206 | 213580 |
| UX | 107944 | 229615 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | One UI 7.0 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5100 mAh | 12000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (51% in 60 min) | Yes (20% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:28 h | 3:00 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 17 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/5.0 (0.2) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
n/a |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | n/a |
| SIM Type | Nano | No |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900) | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | n/a | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | September, 2025 yr | November, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2025 yr | November, 2025 yr |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | No | Yes, 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
