Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite vs Honor Pad X7
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite Manufactured in June, 2021, with display 8.7 with chipsetMediaTek Helio P22T, vs Honor Pad X7, Manufactured in July, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Honor Pad X7
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz
- Lighter design: 365g vs 366g
- Higher battery capacity: 7020mAh vs 5100mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 4/64 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 8.7 in | 8.7 in |
| Resolution | 800x1340 pixels | 800x1340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 5:3 |
| Pixel density | 179 ppi | 179 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | n/a |
| Max brightness | 350 nits | 625 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.3 % | 81.5 % |
| sRGB gamut | 83.4 % | n/a |
| Response time | 40 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1500:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 212.5 mm (8.37 in) | 211.8 mm (8.34 in) |
| Width | 124.7 mm (4.91 in) | 124.8 mm (4.91 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 366 g (12.91 oz) | 365 g (12.87 oz) |
| Area | 265 cm² (41.08 in²) | 264 cm² (40.92 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray |
Gray |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P22T | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
| Max Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.5 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2 (Cortex-A53) |
- 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | CorePilot | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | PowerVR GE8320 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 32 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 41 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | n/a | 407 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | n/a | 1309 |
| CPU | 53451 | 849957 |
| GPU | 15030 | 978432 |
| Memory | 41518 | 398278 |
| UX | 35782 | 591323 |
| NanoReview Score | 145781 | 2817990 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Channels | 1 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | n/a |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | One UI 6 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 5100 mAh | 7020 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 10 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | No |
| Full Charge Time | 3:40 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 08:08 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 11:55 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:59 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 121 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 2 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Video resolution | 720p at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
n/a |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | n/a |
| SIM Type | Nano | No |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | May, 2021 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2021 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 160 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Compass |
Accelerometer |
| Charger Included | Yes 8 W | Yes, 10 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor Pad X7 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 3