Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite vs Infinix Xpad 20
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite Manufactured in June, 2021, with display 8.7 with chipsetMediaTek Helio P22T, vs Infinix Xpad 20, Manufactured in June, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G88. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
- Lighter design: 366g vs 498g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Infinix Xpad 20
- Larger display: 11in
- Higher pixel density: 206ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5100mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 4/64 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 8.7 in | 11 in |
| Resolution | 800x1340 pixels | 1200x1920 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 179 ppi | 206 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 350 nits | 440 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.3 % | 80.5 % |
| sRGB gamut | 83.4 % | n/a |
| Response time | 40 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1500:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 212.5 mm (8.37 in) | 257.7 mm (10.15 in) |
| Width | 124.7 mm (4.91 in) | 169.2 mm (6.66 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 366 g (12.91 oz) | 498 g (17.57 oz) |
| Area | 265 cm² (41.08 in²) | 436 cm² (67.58 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | n/a |
| Frame | Metal | n/a |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray |
- Gray - Green - Red - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P22T | MediaTek Helio G88 |
| Max Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.5 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2 (Cortex-A53) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | CorePilot | MediaTek APU |
| Graphics | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 41 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | n/a | 439 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | n/a | 1455 |
| CPU | 53451 | 88293 |
| GPU | 15030 | 40180 |
| Memory | 41518 | 76933 |
| UX | 35782 | 69361 |
| NanoReview Score | 145781 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 1 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | One UI 6 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 5100 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 10 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | No |
| Full Charge Time | 3:40 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 08:08 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 11:55 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:59 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 121 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
Front camera
| Matrix | 2 MP | 5 MP |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Video resolution | 720p at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
|
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
n/a |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | n/a |
| SIM Type | Nano | No |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | May, 2021 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2021 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 160 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Compass |
Accelerometer |
| Charger Included | Yes 8 W | Yes, 10 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Infinix Xpad 20 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 6