Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 10.9 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 1580, vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad, Manufactured in October, 2022with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
- Larger display: 10.9in
- Higher pixel density: 249ppi
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.2
- Built-in eSIM
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad
- Lighter design: 445g vs 497g
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 3/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 10.9 in | 10.61 in |
| Resolution | 1440x2304 pixels | 1200x2000 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 5:3 |
| Pixel density | 249 ppi | 220 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 750 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.7 % | 81 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 97.3 % | 96.6 % |
| Response time | 32 ms | 30 ms |
| Contrast | 1700:1 | 1493:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 254.3 mm (10.01 in) | 250.38 mm (9.86 in) |
| Width | 165.8 mm (6.53 in) | 157.98 mm (6.22 in) |
| Thickness | 6 mm (0.24 in) | 7.05 mm (0.28 in) |
| Weight | 497 g (17.53 oz) | 445 g (15.7 oz) |
| Area | 422 cm² (65.41 in²) | 396 cm² (61.38 in²) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray - Blue - Purple |
- Silver - Gray - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1580 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Max Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A520) - 3/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/2.9 (Cortex-A720) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Samsung Xclipse 540 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | n/a | 128 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1324 | 735 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3858 | 1994 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 6847 | 1301 |
| CPU | 288527 | 91220 |
| GPU | 256341 | 59261 |
| Memory | 149748 | 75598 |
| UX | 193736 | 77730 |
| NanoReview Score | 888352 | 303809 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| OS Size | 29.5 GB | 22.9 GB |
| UI Skin | One UI 7.0 | MIUI 13 |
Battery
| Volume | 8000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes (25% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:50 h | 2:21 h |
| Web Browsing | 09:55 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 14:58 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:44 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 118 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | n/a |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | GalaxyCore GC08A3 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4" |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | 4000x3000 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.3 |
| Focal length | n/a | 17 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | SK Hynix Hi-846 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
n/a |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | n/a |
| SIM Type | Nano | No |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | n/a |
| Hybrid Slot | No | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | n/a | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | April, 2025 yr | October, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2025 yr | October, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 239 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes 22 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1