Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
72
out 100
VS
51
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 13.1 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 1580, vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A9, Manufactured in October, 2023with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
- Larger display: 13.1in
- Higher pixel density: 259ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 10090mAh vs 5100mAh
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
- Lighter design: 333g vs 664g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 13.1 in | 8.7 in |
| Resolution | 1800x2880 pixels | 800x1340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 8:5 | 5:3 |
| Pixel density | 259 ppi | 179 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | n/a | 500 nits |
| HDR support | n/a | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1 % | 81.9 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 81.2 % |
| Response time | n/a | 44 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 1389:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 300.6 mm (11.83 in) | 211 mm (8.31 in) |
| Width | 194.7 mm (7.67 in) | 124.7 mm (4.91 in) |
| Thickness | 6 mm (0.24 in) | 8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 664 g (23.42 oz) | 333 g (11.75 oz) |
| Area | 585 cm² (90.68 in²) | 263 cm² (40.77 in²) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray - Blue |
- Silver - Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1580 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Max Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A520) - 3/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/2.9 (Cortex-A720) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Samsung Xclipse 540 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | n/a | 128 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1376 | 738 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3860 | 2025 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 6952 | 1262 |
| CPU | 299365 | 98658 |
| GPU | 259844 | 51808 |
| Memory | 149182 | 85127 |
| UX | 192377 | 65871 |
| NanoReview Score | 900768 | 301464 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | n/a | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 |
| UI Skin | One UI 7.0 | One UI 5.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 10090 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 37 min) | Yes (50% in 60 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:45 h | 2:30 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 09:48 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 14:41 h |
| Games | n/a | 05:35 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 132 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 2 MP |
| Matrix | 4000x3000 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900) |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B66) |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | April, 2025 yr | October, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2025 yr | October, 2023 yr |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | No | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
