Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2022)
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 13.1 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 1580, vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2022), Manufactured in May, 2022with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 720G. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
- Larger display: 13.1in
- Higher pixel density: 259ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 10090mAh vs 7040mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Built-in eSIM
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2022)
- Lighter design: 465g vs 664g
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 13.1 in | 10.4 in |
| Resolution | 1800x2880 pixels | 1200x2000 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 8:5 | 5:3 |
| Pixel density | 259 ppi | 224 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | n/a | 500 nits |
| HDR support | n/a | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1 % | 81.6 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 300.6 mm (11.83 in) | 244.5 mm (9.63 in) |
| Width | 194.7 mm (7.67 in) | 154.3 mm (6.07 in) |
| Thickness | 6 mm (0.24 in) | 7 mm (0.28 in) |
| Weight | 664 g (23.42 oz) | 465 g (16.4 oz) |
| Area | 585 cm² (90.68 in²) | 377 cm² (58.44 in²) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray - Blue |
- Gray - Blue - Pink |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1580 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G |
| Max Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A520) - 3/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/2.9 (Cortex-A720) |
- 6/1.8 (Kryo 465 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.3 (Kryo 465 Gold (Cortex-A76)) |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon 692 |
| Graphics | Samsung Xclipse 540 | Adreno 618 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 750 MHz |
| FLOPS | n/a | 384 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1376 | 753 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3860 | 1796 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 6952 | 1068 |
| CPU | 299365 | 128584 |
| GPU | 259844 | 90333 |
| Memory | 149182 | 68159 |
| UX | 192377 | 80696 |
| NanoReview Score | 900768 | 367772 |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 6 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 1045 |
| Writing score | n/a | 9088 |
| Web score | n/a | 6300 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5683 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 6807 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 8350 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | n/a | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| UI Skin | One UI 7.0 | OneUI 6.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 10090 mAh | 7040 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 37 min) | Yes (50% in 70 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:45 h | 2:45 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 09:15 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 13:14 h |
| Games | n/a | 05:35 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 151 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | n/a |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.9 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 5 MP |
| Matrix | 4000x3000 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/5.0" |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | April, 2025 yr | May, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2025 yr | May, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 349 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes 8 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 9