Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
72
out 100
VS
53
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 13.1 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 1580, vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE, Manufactured in September, 2023with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
- Larger display: 13.1in
- Higher pixel density: 259ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 10090mAh vs 8000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Built-in eSIM
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
- Lighter design: 478g vs 664g
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 13.1 in | 11 in |
| Resolution | 1800x2880 pixels | 1200x1920 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 8:5 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 259 ppi | 207 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | n/a | 400 nits |
| HDR support | n/a | Yes HDR10 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1 % | 82.2 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 93.1 % |
| Response time | n/a | 37 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 1689:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 300.6 mm (11.83 in) | 255.53 mm (10.06 in) |
| Width | 194.7 mm (7.67 in) | 167.08 mm (6.58 in) |
| Thickness | 6 mm (0.24 in) | 7.36 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 664 g (23.42 oz) | 478 g (16.86 oz) |
| Area | 585 cm² (90.68 in²) | 427 cm² (66.19 in²) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray - Blue |
- Gray - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1580 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
| Max Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A520) - 3/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/2.9 (Cortex-A720) |
- 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Samsung Xclipse 540 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 1114 MHz |
| FLOPS | n/a | 284 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1376 | 412 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3860 | 1423 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 6952 | 348 |
| CPU | 299365 | 91109 |
| GPU | 259844 | 40869 |
| Memory | 149182 | 68964 |
| UX | 192377 | 78274 |
| NanoReview Score | 900768 | 279216 |
| Writing score | n/a | 9238 |
| Web score | n/a | 6619 |
| Video editing | n/a | 3677 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 5908 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 6945 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | n/a | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 |
| OS Size | n/a | 22 GB |
| UI Skin | One UI 7.0 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 10090 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 37 min) | Yes (24% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:45 h | 2:45 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 10:41 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 12:28 h |
| Games | n/a | 06:20 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 183 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | n/a |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 5 MP |
| Matrix | 4000x3000 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/5.0" |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
n/a |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | n/a |
| SIM Type | Nano | No |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | n/a |
| Hybrid Slot | No | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | April, 2025 yr | August, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2025 yr | September, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 249 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Accelerometer |
| Charger Included | No | Yes 18 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
