Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7
72
out 100
VS
50
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 13.1 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 1580, vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7, Manufactured in August, 2024with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
- Larger display: 13.1in
- Higher pixel density: 259ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 10090mAh vs 6650mAh
- Built-in eSIM
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7
- Lighter design: 373g vs 664g
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 13.1 in | 8.7 in |
| Resolution | 1800x2880 pixels | 800x1340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 8:5 | 5:3 |
| Pixel density | 259 ppi | 179 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | n/a | 600 nits |
| HDR support | n/a | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1 % | 81.2 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 82.8 % |
| Response time | n/a | 43 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 1349:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 300.6 mm (11.83 in) | 211.58 mm (8.33 in) |
| Width | 194.7 mm (7.67 in) | 125.48 mm (4.94 in) |
| Thickness | 6 mm (0.24 in) | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 664 g (23.42 oz) | 373 g (13.16 oz) |
| Area | 585 cm² (90.68 in²) | 265 cm² (41.08 in²) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP53 |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray - Blue |
- Gray - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1580 | MediaTek Helio G85 |
| Max Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A520) - 3/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/2.9 (Cortex-A720) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Samsung Xclipse 540 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | n/a | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1376 | 412 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3860 | 1427 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 6952 | 543 |
| CPU | 299365 | 87644 |
| GPU | 259844 | 40113 |
| Memory | 149182 | 66546 |
| UX | 192377 | 75552 |
| NanoReview Score | 900768 | 269855 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | n/a | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| OS Size | n/a | 14 GB |
| UI Skin | One UI 7.0 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 10090 mAh | 6650 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 37 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:45 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 11:43 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 15:55 h |
| Games | n/a | 06:32 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 135 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | n/a |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 5 MP |
| Matrix | 4000x3000 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/5.0" |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B13/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | April, 2025 yr | July, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2025 yr | August, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 95 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Accelerometer - Compass |
| Charger Included | No | Yes 18 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
