Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra vs Honor Pad X7
87
out 100
VS
53
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 14.6 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus, vs Honor Pad X7, Manufactured in July, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
- Larger display: 14.6in
- Higher pixel density: 239ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 11200mAh vs 7020mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Honor Pad X7
- Lighter design: 365g vs 718g
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 14.6 in | 8.7 in |
| Resolution | 1848x2960 pixels | 800x1340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 5:3 |
| Pixel density | 239 ppi | 179 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (30-120 Hz) | n/a |
| Max brightness | 930 nits | 625 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8 % | 81.5 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 99.9 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 120 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 3 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 326.4 mm (12.85 in) | 211.8 mm (8.34 in) |
| Width | 208.6 mm (8.21 in) | 124.8 mm (4.91 in) |
| Thickness | 5.4 mm (0.21 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 718 g (25.33 oz) | 365 g (12.87 oz) |
| Area | 681 cm² (105.56 in²) | 264 cm² (40.92 in²) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray |
Gray |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
| Max Frequency | 3250 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.4 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 790 | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2135 | 407 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7125 | 1309 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 14163 | n/a |
| CPU | 507676 | 849957 |
| GPU | 856935 | 978432 |
| Memory | 363400 | 398278 |
| UX | 310118 | 591323 |
| NanoReview Score | 2038129 | 2817990 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4800 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | n/a |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 28.1 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | One UI 6.1 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 11200 mAh | 7020 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 10 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (80% in 61 min) | No |
| Full Charge Time | 1:43 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 12:16 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 18:22 h | n/a |
| Games | 09:39 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 168 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 5 MP |
| Matrix | 4000x3000 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
n/a |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | n/a |
| SIM Type | Nano | No |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Budget |
| Announced | September, 2024 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 1199 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
Accelerometer |
| Charger Included | No | Yes, 10 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
