Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2020) vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2020) Manufactured in May, 2020, with display 10.4 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 9611, vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro, Manufactured in April, 2024with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2020)
- Lighter design: 467g vs 571g
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
- Larger display: 12.1in
- Higher pixel density: 249ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 10000mAh vs 7040mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 10.4 in | 12.1 in |
| Resolution | 1200x2000 pixels | 1600x2560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 224 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.6 % | 83.4 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 94.5 % | 94 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 81970 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 36 ms | 20 ms |
| Contrast | 1734:1 | 1283:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 244.5 mm (9.63 in) | 280 mm (11.02 in) |
| Width | 154.3 mm (6.07 in) | 181.85 mm (7.16 in) |
| Thickness | 7 mm (0.28 in) | 7.52 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 467 g (16.47 oz) | 571 g (20.14 oz) |
| Area | 377 cm² (58.44 in²) | 509 cm² (78.9 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | IP52 |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue - Pink |
- Gray - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 |
| Max Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.7 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A73) |
- 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 710 |
| GPU Cores | 54 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1053 MHz | 940 MHz |
| FLOPS | 113.8 GFLOPS | 481.3 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 372 | 1015 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1178 | 2970 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 1456 | n/a |
| CPU | 70076 | 148674 |
| GPU | 55712 | 127282 |
| Memory | 60670 | 112531 |
| UX | 59901 | 147978 |
| NanoReview Score | 246359 | 536465 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 36.7 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 61 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 5 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 896 | n/a |
| Writing score | 7178 | n/a |
| Web score | 4923 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5061 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 4815 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 6104 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | Android 14 |
| OS Size | 14.9 GB | 28 GB |
| UI Skin | OneUI 5.1 | HyperOS |
Battery
| Volume | 7040 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 70 min) | Yes (28% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:45 h | 2:00 h |
| Web Browsing | 09:49 h | 07:10 h |
| Video Playback | 14:28 h | 11:19 h |
| Games | 06:18 h | 05:30 h |
| Standby Mode | 133 h | 149 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
n/a |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | No |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | April, 2020 yr | April, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2020 yr | April, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 349 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 8 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 8