Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro vs OnePlus Pad
86
out 100
VS
68
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro Manufactured in June, 2024, with display 13 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus, vs OnePlus Pad, Manufactured in April, 2023with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9000. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro
- Larger display: 13in
- Higher battery capacity: 11500mAh vs 9510mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
Reasons to choose OnePlus Pad
- Higher pixel density: 296ppi
- Lighter design: 552g vs 679g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 13 in | 11.61 in |
| Resolution | 2064x3096 pixels | 2000x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 7:5 |
| Pixel density | 286 ppi | 296 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 900 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.6 % | 84.2 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 99.8 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 60 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 20 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 1481:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 289.56 mm (11.4 in) | 258.03 mm (10.16 in) |
| Width | 198.32 mm (7.81 in) | 189.41 mm (7.46 in) |
| Thickness | 6.64 mm (0.26 in) | 6.54 mm (0.26 in) |
| Weight | 679 g (23.95 oz) | 552 g (19.47 oz) |
| Area | 574 cm² (88.97 in²) | 489 cm² (75.8 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray - Blue |
Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 |
| Max Frequency | 3400 MHz | 3050 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.4 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A510) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-A710) - 1/3.05 (Cortex-X2) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 790 | MediaTek APU 590 |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G710 MP10 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 960 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 848 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS | 1085.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2261 | 1691 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7567 | 4386 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 15782 | 6296 |
| CPU | 509548 | 279734 |
| GPU | 824362 | 281624 |
| Memory | 380749 | 165047 |
| UX | 371079 | 232559 |
| NanoReview Score | 2085738 | 958964 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 15) |
| OS Size | n/a | 23 GB |
| UI Skin | OriginOS 4 | OxygenOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 11500 mAh | 9510 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 66 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 1:18 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 08:15 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 12:45 h |
| Games | n/a | 05:59 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 112 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | 4160x3120 pixels |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 23 mm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.3 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | n/a | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2024 yr | February, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2024 yr | April, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 470 | 479 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | Yes 66 W | Yes 67 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
