Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco Pad
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro Manufactured in June, 2024, with display 13 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad, Manufactured in May, 2024with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro
- Larger display: 13in
- Higher pixel density: 286ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 11500mAh vs 10000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad
- Lighter design: 571g vs 679g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 13 in | 12.1 in |
| Resolution | 2064x3096 pixels | 1600x2560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 286 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 900 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.6 % | 83.4 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 289.56 mm (11.4 in) | 280 mm (11.02 in) |
| Width | 198.32 mm (7.81 in) | 181.85 mm (7.16 in) |
| Thickness | 6.64 mm (0.26 in) | 7.52 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 679 g (23.95 oz) | 571 g (20.14 oz) |
| Area | 574 cm² (88.97 in²) | 509 cm² (78.9 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | n/a |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray - Blue |
- Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 |
| Max Frequency | 3400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.4 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 790 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 710 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 940 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS | 481.3 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2261 | 1020 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7567 | 3012 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 15782 | n/a |
| CPU | 509548 | 208949 |
| GPU | 824362 | 119652 |
| Memory | 380749 | 137831 |
| UX | 371079 | 152455 |
| NanoReview Score | 2085738 | 618887 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | OriginOS 4 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 11500 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 66 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (29% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 2:00 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | n/a | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | n/a | 1 |
| SIM Type | No | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA 1/2/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B71) |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2024 yr | May, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2024 yr | May, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 470 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | Yes 66 W | Yes 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0