Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco Pad

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro Manufactured in June, 2024, with display 13 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad, Manufactured in May, 2024with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro
  • Larger display: 13in
  • Higher pixel density: 286ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 11500mAh vs 10000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad
  • Lighter design: 571g vs 679g
  • Supports Dolby Atmos

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB
- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro and Xiaomi Poco Pad
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 13 in 12.1 in
Resolution 2064x3096 pixels 1600x2560 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 16:10
Pixel density 286 ppi 249 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes No
Max brightness 900 nits 600 nits
HDR support Yes HDR10 Yes Dolby Vision
Screen-to-body ratio 87.6 % 83.4 %
Features DCI-P3 DCI-P3

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 289.56 mm (11.4 in) 280 mm (11.02 in)
Width 198.32 mm (7.81 in) 181.85 mm (7.16 in)
Thickness 6.64 mm (0.26 in) 7.52 mm (0.3 in)
Weight 679 g (23.95 oz) 571 g (20.14 oz)
Area 574 cm² (88.97 in²) 509 cm² (78.9 in²)
Water resistance No n/a
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Silver
- Gray
- Blue
- Gray
- Blue
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro
87.6 %
Xiaomi Poco Pad
83.4 %

Performance

Testing Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro and Xiaomi Poco Pad In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
Max Frequency 3400 MHz 2400 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4/2 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.4 (Cortex-X4)
- 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55)
- 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78)
Process TSMC Samsung
Transistor Size 4 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek APU 790 Yes
Graphics Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 710
GPU Cores 1536 256
GPU Frequency 1300 MHz 940 MHz
FLOPS 3993.6 GFLOPS 481.3 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro
2261
Xiaomi Poco Pad
1020
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro
7567
Xiaomi Poco Pad
3012
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)22611020
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)75673012
Geekbench Compute (GPU)15782n/a
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro
2085738
Xiaomi Poco Pad
618887
CPU509548208949
GPU824362119652
Memory380749137831
UX371079152455
NanoReview Score2085738618887

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 4200 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 2.2
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 14 Android 14
UI Skin OriginOS 4 HyperOS 1.0

Battery

Volume 11500 mAh 10000 mAh
Max Charging Power 66 W 33 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes Yes (29% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time n/a 2:00 h

Main camera

Matrix 13 MP 8 MP
Photo resolution 4160x3120 pixels n/a
Zoom n/a Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion n/a No
Lenses count Standard: 13 MP Standard: 8 MP
Features Bokeh effect Bokeh effect
Main lens
Matrix13 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/1.8
Sensor sizen/a1/4.0"
Pixel sizen/a1.12 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 8 MP
Matrix 3264x2448 pixels n/a
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size n/a 1/4.0"
Pixel size n/a 1.12 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort n/a No
GPS n/a - GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo
NFC* Yes No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*n/a1
SIM TypeNoNano
eSIM Support *n/aNo
Hybrid Slotn/aNo
2G Bandsn/aGSM 850/900/1800/1900
3G Bandsn/aWCDMA 1/2/5/8
LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B71)
5G SupportNoYes

Sound

Speakers 8.0 4.0
3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes

Other

Class Flagship Mid-range
Announced May, 2024 yr May, 2024 yr
Release Date June, 2024 yr May, 2024 yr
Launch Price ($) 470 n/a
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Hall Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
Charger Included Yes 66 W Yes 33 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below