Vivo Pad 3 Pro vs Huawei MatePad 12 X
84
out 100
VS
71
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo Pad 3 Pro Manufactured in April, 2024, with display 13 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300, vs Huawei MatePad 12 X, Manufactured in October, 2024with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin T90A. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo Pad 3 Pro
- Larger display: 13in
- Higher pixel density: 286ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 11500mAh vs 10100mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1
Reasons to choose Huawei MatePad 12 X
- Lighter design: 555g vs 678.9g
- Supports DisplayPort
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 13 in | 12 in |
| Resolution | 2064x3096 pixels | 2800x1840 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Pixel density | 286 ppi | 279 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (30-144 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 900 nits | 1000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes HDR10 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.6 % | 86.8 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 99.6 % |
| Response time | n/a | 21 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 1122:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 289.56 mm (11.4 in) | 270 mm (10.63 in) |
| Width | 198.32 mm (7.81 in) | 183 mm (7.2 in) |
| Thickness | 6.64 mm (0.26 in) | 5.9 mm (0.23 in) |
| Weight | 678.9 g (23.95 oz) | 555 g (19.58 oz) |
| Area | 574 cm² (88.97 in²) | 494 cm² (76.57 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue - Purple |
- White - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | HiSilicon Kirin T90A |
| Max Frequency | 3250 MHz | 2490 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | n/a |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-X4) |
n/a |
| Process | TSMC | n/a |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | n/a |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 790 | n/a |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2170 | 1229 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7166 | 3987 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 15620 | n/a |
| CPU | 482771 | 293566 |
| GPU | 808450 | 171805 |
| Memory | 388611 | 226709 |
| UX | 325324 | 160938 |
| NanoReview Score | 2005156 | 853018 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | HarmonyOS 4.2 |
| OS Size | n/a | 30 GB |
| UI Skin | OriginOS 4 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 11500 mAh | 10100 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 66 W | 66 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 1:50 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | 4160x3120 pixels |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 13 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | 3264x2448 pixels | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | 6.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | March, 2024 yr | September, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2024 yr | October, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 420 | 549 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 66 W | Yes 66 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo Pad 3 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
