Home Tablet comparison Vivo Pad 3 Pro and Infinix Xpad 20 - Which is better?

Vivo Pad 3 Pro vs Infinix Xpad 20

84 out 100
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
VS
52 out 100
Infinix Xpad 20
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
Infinix Xpad 20

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo Pad 3 Pro Manufactured in April, 2024, with display 13 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300, vs Infinix Xpad 20, Manufactured in June, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G88. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo Pad 3 Pro
  • Larger display: 13in
  • Higher pixel density: 286ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 11500mAh vs 7000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
Reasons to choose Infinix Xpad 20
  • Lighter design: 498g vs 678.9g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB		 - 4/128 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo Pad 3 Pro and Infinix Xpad 20
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Tablets:
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
vs
Infinix Xpad 20

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 13 in 11 in
Resolution 2064x3096 pixels 1200x1920 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 16:10
Pixel density 286 ppi 206 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes No
Max brightness 900 nits 440 nits
HDR support Yes HDR10 No
Screen-to-body ratio 87.6 % 80.5 %
Features DCI-P3 n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 289.56 mm (11.4 in) 257.7 mm (10.15 in)
Width 198.32 mm (7.81 in) 169.2 mm (6.66 in)
Thickness 6.64 mm (0.26 in) 7.9 mm (0.31 in)
Weight 678.9 g (23.95 oz) 498 g (17.57 oz)
Area 574 cm² (88.97 in²) 436 cm² (67.58 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal n/a
Frame Metal n/a
Colors - Gray
- Blue
- Purple		 - Gray
- Green
- Red
- Purple
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
87.6 %
Infinix Xpad 20
80.5 %

Performance

Testing Vivo Pad 3 Pro and Infinix Xpad 20 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9300 MediaTek Helio G88
Max Frequency 3250 MHz 2000 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4/2 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.25 (Cortex-X4)		 - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2 (Cortex-A75)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 12 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek APU 790 MediaTek APU
Graphics Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G52 MP2
GPU Cores 1536 48
GPU Frequency 1300 MHz 1000 MHz
FLOPS 3993.6 GFLOPS 96 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
2170
Infinix Xpad 20
439
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
7166
Infinix Xpad 20
1455
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)2170439
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)71661455
Geekbench Compute (GPU)15620n/a
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo Pad 3 Pro], [Infinix Xpad 20]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
2005156
Infinix Xpad 20
n/a
CPU48277188293
GPU80845040180
Memory38861176933
UX32532469361
NanoReview Score2005156n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 4 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 4200 MHz 1800 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity128 GB128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0eMMC 5.1
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 14 Android 15
UI Skin OriginOS 4 n/a

Battery

Volume 11500 mAh 7000 mAh
Max Charging Power 66 W 10 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes No

Main camera

Matrix 13 MP 8 MP
Photo resolution 4160x3120 pixels n/a
Zoom n/a Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital No
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Lenses count Standard: 13 MP Standard: 8 MP
Features Bokeh effect
Main lens
Matrix13 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.2n/a
AutofocusPhase autofocusNo
StabilizationDigitalNo

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 5 MP
Matrix 3264x2448 pixels n/a
Sensor CMOS n/a
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort n/a No
NFC* Yes No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM TypeNoNo
eSIM Support *n/aNo
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

Speakers 8.0 n/a
3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos No No

Other

Class Flagship Budget
Announced March, 2024 yr May, 2025 yr
Release Date April, 2024 yr June, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 420 n/a
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor		 Accelerometer
Charger Included Yes 66 W Yes, 10 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo Pad 3 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
1 (33.33%)
2 (66.67%)
Total Votes: 3

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below