Vivo Pad 3 Pro vs Xiaomi Pad 6
84
out 100
VS
66
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo Pad 3 Pro Manufactured in April, 2024, with display 13 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300, vs Xiaomi Pad 6, Manufactured in April, 2023with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 870. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo Pad 3 Pro
- Larger display: 13in
- Higher battery capacity: 11500mAh vs 8840mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 6
- Higher pixel density: 309ppi
- Lighter design: 490g vs 678.9g
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 13 in | 11 in |
| Resolution | 2064x3096 pixels | 1800x2880 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 286 ppi | 309 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 900 nits | 550 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.6 % | 83.6 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 97 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 181600 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 26 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 832:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 289.56 mm (11.4 in) | 253.95 mm (10 in) |
| Width | 198.32 mm (7.81 in) | 165.18 mm (6.5 in) |
| Thickness | 6.64 mm (0.26 in) | 6.51 mm (0.26 in) |
| Weight | 678.9 g (23.95 oz) | 490 g (17.28 oz) |
| Area | 574 cm² (88.97 in²) | 419 cm² (64.95 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue - Purple |
- Silver - Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 |
| Max Frequency | 3250 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)) - 1/3.2 (Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 790 | Hexagon 698 |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 670 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS | 1029.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2170 | 1335 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7166 | 3584 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 15620 | 3371 |
| CPU | 482771 | 219811 |
| GPU | 808450 | 277960 |
| Memory | 388611 | 129368 |
| UX | 325324 | 199071 |
| NanoReview Score | 2005156 | 826210 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 44.2 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 71 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 21 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 3635 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| OS Size | n/a | 21 GB |
| UI Skin | OriginOS 4 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 11500 mAh | 8840 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 66 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (38% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 1:30 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 10:22 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 14:17 h |
| Games | n/a | 06:47 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 139 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 120 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | n/a |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | March, 2024 yr | April, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2024 yr | April, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 420 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 66 W | Yes 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo Pad 3 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
