Home Tablet comparison Vivo Pad 3 Pro and Xiaomi Pad 7 - Which is better?

Vivo Pad 3 Pro vs Xiaomi Pad 7

84 out 100
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
VS
80 out 100
Xiaomi Pad 7
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
Xiaomi Pad 7

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo Pad 3 Pro Manufactured in April, 2024, with display 13 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300, vs Xiaomi Pad 7, Manufactured in October, 2024with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo Pad 3 Pro
  • Larger display: 13in
  • Higher battery capacity: 11500mAh vs 8850mAh
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 7
  • Higher pixel density: 344ppi
  • Lighter design: 500g vs 678.9g
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
  • Infrared port

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB		 - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo Pad 3 Pro and Xiaomi Pad 7
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Tablets:
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
vs
Xiaomi Pad 7

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 13 in 11.2 in
Resolution 2064x3096 pixels 2136x3200 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 3:2
Pixel density 286 ppi 344 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes n/a
Max brightness 900 nits 800 nits
HDR support Yes HDR10 Yes Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate n/a 360 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 87.6 % 85.7 %
Features DCI-P3 DCI-P3

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 289.56 mm (11.4 in) 251.22 mm (9.89 in)
Width 198.32 mm (7.81 in) 173.42 mm (6.83 in)
Thickness 6.64 mm (0.26 in) 6.18 mm (0.24 in)
Weight 678.9 g (23.95 oz) 500 g (17.64 oz)
Area 574 cm² (88.97 in²) 436 cm² (67.58 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Gray
- Blue
- Purple		 - Black
- Blue
- Green
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
87.6 %
Xiaomi Pad 7
85.7 %

Performance

Testing Vivo Pad 3 Pro and Xiaomi Pad 7 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3
Max Frequency 3250 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 4/2 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.25 (Cortex-X4)		 - 3/1.9 (Cortex-A520)
- 4/2.6 (Cortex-A720)
- 1/2.8 (Cortex-X4)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek APU 790 Yes
Graphics Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 732
GPU Cores 1536 768
GPU Frequency 1300 MHz 950 MHz
FLOPS 3993.6 GFLOPS 1459.2 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
2170
Xiaomi Pad 7
1904
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
7166
Xiaomi Pad 7
5081
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)21701904
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)71665081
Geekbench Compute (GPU)15620n/a
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo Pad 3 Pro]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
2005156
Xiaomi Pad 7
1373040
CPU482771360403
GPU808450471479
Memory388611307567
UX325324233591
NanoReview Score20051561373040

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 4200 MHz 4200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage Capacity128 GB128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory CardNon/a

Software

OS Android 14 Android 15
UI Skin OriginOS 4 HyperOS 2.0

Battery

Volume 11500 mAh 8850 mAh
Max Charging Power 66 W 45 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes Yes (50% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time n/a 1:20 h

Main camera

Matrix 13 MP 13 MP
Photo resolution 4160x3120 pixels n/a
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No n/a
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Lenses count Standard: 13 MP Standard: 13 MP
Features Bokeh effect n/a
Main lens
Matrix13 MP13 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/2.2
Sensor sizen/a1/3.06"
Pixel sizen/a1.12 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 8 MP
Matrix 3264x2448 pixels n/a
Aperture n/a f/2.3
Sensor CMOS Omnivision OV08D10
Sensor size n/a 1/4.0"
Pixel size n/a 1.12 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort n/a Yes
NFC* Yes No
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM TypeNoNo
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

Speakers 8.0 Stereo
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes

Other

Class Flagship Mid-range
Announced March, 2024 yr October, 2024 yr
Release Date April, 2024 yr October, 2024 yr
Launch Price ($) 420 300
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
Charger Included Yes 66 W Yes 45 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
6 (66.67%)
3 (33.33%)
Total Votes: 9

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below