Vivo Pad 3 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo Pad 3 Pro Manufactured in April, 2024, with display 13 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300, vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro, Manufactured in September, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo Pad 3 Pro
  • Larger display: 13in
  • Higher pixel density: 286ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
  • Lighter design: 610g vs 678.9g
  • Higher battery capacity: 12000mAh vs 11500mAh
  • Supports Dolby Atmos

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 8/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo Pad 3 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 13 in 12.1 in
Resolution 2064x3096 pixels 1600x2560 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 16:10
Pixel density 286 ppi 249 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max brightness 900 nits n/a
HDR support Yes HDR10 No
Touch Sampling Rate n/a 360 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 87.6 % 83.5 %
Features DCI-P3 n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 289.56 mm (11.4 in) 279.8 mm (11.02 in)
Width 198.32 mm (7.81 in) 181.7 mm (7.15 in)
Thickness 6.64 mm (0.26 in) 7.5 mm (0.3 in)
Weight 678.9 g (23.95 oz) 610 g (21.52 oz)
Area 574 cm² (88.97 in²) 508 cm² (78.74 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Gray
- Blue
- Purple
- Silver
- Gray
- Purple
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
87.6 %
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
83.5 %

Performance

Testing Vivo Pad 3 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Max Frequency 3250 MHz 2700 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4/2 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.25 (Cortex-X4)
- 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520))
- 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720))
- 1/2.7 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720))
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek APU 790 Yes
Graphics Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 810
GPU Cores 1536 256
GPU Frequency 1300 MHz n/a
FLOPS 3993.6 GFLOPS n/a
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
2170
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
1210
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
7166
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
3325
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)21701210
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)71663325
Geekbench Compute (GPU)15620n/a
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
2005156
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
n/a
CPU482771290548
GPU808450298705
Memory388611185452
UX325324161215
NanoReview Score2005156n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 6 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 4200 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity128 GB128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 2.2
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 14 Android 15
UI Skin OriginOS 4 HyperOS 2.0

Battery

Volume 11500 mAh 12000 mAh
Max Charging Power 66 W 33 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No Yes
Fast Charging Yes Yes

Main camera

Matrix 13 MP 8 MP
Photo resolution 4160x3120 pixels n/a
Zoom n/a Digital
Flash LED No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion n/a No
Lenses count Standard: 13 MP Standard: 8 MP
Features Bokeh effect
Main lens
Matrix13 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/2.0
Sensor sizen/a1/4
Pixel sizen/a1.12 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 8 MP
Matrix 3264x2448 pixels n/a
Aperture n/a f/2.2
Focal length n/a 17 mm
Sensor CMOS n/a
Sensor size n/a 1/5.0
Pixel size n/a 1.12 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort n/a No
NFC* Yes No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*n/a2
SIM TypeNoNo
SIM Moden/aDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *n/aNo
Hybrid Slotn/aNo
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

Speakers 8.0 4.0
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes

Other

Class Flagship Mid-range
Announced March, 2024 yr September, 2025 yr
Release Date April, 2024 yr September, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 420 n/a
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
Charger Included Yes 66 W Yes, 33 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo Pad 3 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below