Vivo Pad 3 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7
84
out 100
VS
50
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo Pad 3 Pro Manufactured in April, 2024, with display 13 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300, vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7, Manufactured in August, 2024with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo Pad 3 Pro
- Larger display: 13in
- Higher pixel density: 286ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 11500mAh vs 6650mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7
- Lighter design: 373g vs 678.9g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 13 in | 8.7 in |
| Resolution | 2064x3096 pixels | 800x1340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 5:3 |
| Pixel density | 286 ppi | 179 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 900 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.6 % | 81.2 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 82.8 % |
| Response time | n/a | 43 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 1349:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 289.56 mm (11.4 in) | 211.58 mm (8.33 in) |
| Width | 198.32 mm (7.81 in) | 125.48 mm (4.94 in) |
| Thickness | 6.64 mm (0.26 in) | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 678.9 g (23.95 oz) | 373 g (13.16 oz) |
| Area | 574 cm² (88.97 in²) | 265 cm² (41.08 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | IP53 |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue - Purple |
- Gray - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | MediaTek Helio G85 |
| Max Frequency | 3250 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-X4) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 790 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2170 | 412 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7166 | 1427 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 15620 | 543 |
| CPU | 482771 | 87644 |
| GPU | 808450 | 40113 |
| Memory | 388611 | 66546 |
| UX | 325324 | 75552 |
| NanoReview Score | 2005156 | 269855 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| OS Size | n/a | 14 GB |
| UI Skin | OriginOS 4 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 11500 mAh | 6650 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 66 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 11:43 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 15:55 h |
| Games | n/a | 06:32 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 135 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | n/a |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Matrix | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/5.0" |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | n/a | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | n/a | 2 |
| SIM Type | No | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B13/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Budget |
| Announced | March, 2024 yr | July, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2024 yr | August, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 420 | 95 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Accelerometer - Compass |
| Charger Included | Yes 66 W | Yes 18 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo Pad 3 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
