Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)

Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro Manufactured in April, 2023, with display 11 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1, vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus), Manufactured in December, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7300. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro
  • Higher pixel density: 309ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 8600mAh vs 7040mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.1
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
  • Includes charger
  • Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
  • Built-in eSIM

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 8/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD TFT LCD
Size 11 in 11 in
Resolution 1800x2880 pixels 1200x1920 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 5:3
Pixel density 309 ppi 206 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No n/a
Max brightness 550 nits n/a
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision No
Screen-to-body ratio 83.6 % 79.4 %
Features DCI-P3 n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 253.95 mm (10 in) 257.1 mm (10.12 in)
Width 165.18 mm (6.5 in) 168.7 mm (6.64 in)
Thickness 6.51 mm (0.26 in) 6.9 mm (0.27 in)
Weight 490 g (17.28 oz) n/a
Area 419 cm² (64.95 in²) 434 cm² (67.27 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Black
- Gold
- Blue
- Silver
- Gray
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button No
Screen-to-body ratio
Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro
83.6 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
79.4 %

Performance

Testing Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus) In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 MediaTek Dimensity 7300
Max Frequency 3190 MHz 2500 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4/2 (Cortex-A510)
- 3/2.75 (Cortex-A710)
- 1/3.2 (Cortex-X2)
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 4/2.5 (Cortex-A78)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Hexagon MediaTek APU 655
Graphics Adreno 730 Mali-G615 MP2
GPU Cores 1024 256
GPU Frequency 900 MHz 1047 MHz
FLOPS 1843.2 GFLOPS 536.1 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro
1771
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
1050
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro
4690
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
3102
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)17711050
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)46903102
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro
1292685
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
n/a
CPU356904212028
GPU478169143778
Memory204804165593
UX252808173039
NanoReview Score1292685n/a
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro
10184
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
n/a
Stability93 %n/a
Graphics Test60 fpsn/a
Graphics Score10184n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 6 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity128 GB128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 3.1UFS 2.2
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 13 Android 16
OS Size 21 GB n/a
UI Skin HyperOS 1.0 One UI 8.0

Battery

Volume 8600 mAh 7040 mAh
Max Charging Power 67 W 25 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-ion
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes (55% in 30 min) Yes
Full Charge Time 1:02 h n/a
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro
27:04
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
n/a
Web Browsing10:39 hn/a
Video Playback14:31 hn/a
Games06:20 hn/a
Standby Mode142 hn/a

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 8 MP
Zoom n/a Digital
Flash Dual LED No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion 120 fps (720p) No
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Depth: 2 MP
Standard: 8 MP
Features
Main lens
Matrix50 MP8 MP
Aperturef/1.8n/a
SensorSamsung S5KJN1n/a
Sensor size1/2.76"n/a
Pixel size0.64 μmn/a
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 20 MP 5 MP
Aperture f/2.2 n/a
Sensor Sony IMX596 CMOS
Sensor size 1/2" n/a
Pixel size 0.8 μm n/a
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.1
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS n/a - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* No No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*n/a1
SIM TypeNoNano
eSIM Support *n/aYes
Hybrid Slotn/aNo
2G Bandsn/aGSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900
3G Bandsn/aUMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900)
LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B66)
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes

Other

Class Mid-range Mid-range
Announced April, 2023 yr September, 2025 yr
Release Date April, 2023 yr December, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 499 n/a
Sensors - Hall Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
Charger Included Yes 67 W No
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below