Xiaomi Pad 6 vs Infinix Xpad 20
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Pad 6 Manufactured in April, 2023, with display 11 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 870, vs Infinix Xpad 20, Manufactured in June, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G88. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 6
- Higher pixel density: 309ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 490g vs 498g
- Higher battery capacity: 8840mAh vs 7000mAh
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Infinix Xpad 20
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11 in | 11 in |
| Resolution | 1800x2880 pixels | 1200x1920 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 309 ppi | 206 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 550 nits | 440 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.6 % | 80.5 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 97 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 181600 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 26 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 832:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 253.95 mm (10 in) | 257.7 mm (10.15 in) |
| Width | 165.18 mm (6.5 in) | 169.2 mm (6.66 in) |
| Thickness | 6.51 mm (0.26 in) | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 490 g (17.28 oz) | 498 g (17.57 oz) |
| Area | 419 cm² (64.95 in²) | 436 cm² (67.58 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | n/a |
| Frame | Metal | n/a |
| Colors | - Silver - Gold - Blue |
- Gray - Green - Red - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | MediaTek Helio G88 |
| Max Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)) - 1/3.2 (Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 698 | MediaTek APU |
| Graphics | Adreno 650 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 670 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1029.1 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1335 | 439 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3584 | 1455 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 3371 | n/a |
| CPU | 219811 | 88293 |
| GPU | 277960 | 40180 |
| Memory | 129368 | 76933 |
| UX | 199071 | 69361 |
| NanoReview Score | 826210 | n/a |
| Max Surface Temp. | 44.2 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 71 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 21 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 3635 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 21 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 8840 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 10 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (38% in 30 min) | No |
| Full Charge Time | 1:30 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 10:22 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 14:17 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:47 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 139 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
|
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | n/a | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | April, 2023 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2023 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
Accelerometer |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | Yes, 10 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 6 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0