Xiaomi Pad 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite

Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Pad 6 Manufactured in April, 2023, with display 11 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 870, vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite, Manufactured in June, 2021with chipsetMediaTek Helio P22T. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 6
  • Larger display: 11in
  • Higher pixel density: 309ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 8840mAh vs 5100mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
  • Lighter design: 366g vs 490g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 2/32 GB
- 3/32 GB
- 4/64 GB

Review

Key Specs Xiaomi Pad 6 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD TFT LCD
Size 11 in 8.7 in
Resolution 1800x2880 pixels 800x1340 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 5:3
Pixel density 309 ppi 179 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 60 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No No
Max brightness 550 nits 350 nits
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision No
Screen-to-body ratio 83.6 % 81.3 %
Features DCI-P3 n/a
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Xiaomi Pad 6
501 nits
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
330 nits
sRGB gamut97 %83.4 %
PWM (Flicker)181600 Hzn/a
Response time26 ms40 ms
Contrast832:11500:1

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 253.95 mm (10 in) 212.5 mm (8.37 in)
Width 165.18 mm (6.5 in) 124.7 mm (4.91 in)
Thickness 6.51 mm (0.26 in) 8 mm (0.31 in)
Weight 490 g (17.28 oz) 366 g (12.91 oz)
Area 419 cm² (64.95 in²) 265 cm² (41.08 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Silver
- Gold
- Blue
- Silver
- Gray
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Xiaomi Pad 6
83.6 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
81.3 %

Performance

Testing Xiaomi Pad 6 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 MediaTek Helio P22T
Max Frequency 3200 MHz 2300 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4/1.8 (Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55))
- 3/2.42 (Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77))
- 1/3.2 (Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77))
- 4/1.5 (Cortex-A53)
- 4/2 (Cortex-A53)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 7 nm 12 nm
Neural Processor Hexagon 698 CorePilot
Graphics Adreno 650 PowerVR GE8320
GPU Cores 768 32
GPU Frequency 670 MHz 650 MHz
FLOPS 1029.1 GFLOPS 41 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Xiaomi Pad 6
1335
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
n/a
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Xiaomi Pad 6
3584
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
n/a
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)1335n/a
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)3584n/a
Geekbench Compute (GPU)3371n/a
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Xiaomi Pad 6
826210
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
145781
CPU21981153451
GPU27796015030
Memory12936841518
UX19907135782
NanoReview Score826210145781
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Pad 6
3635
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
n/a
Max Surface Temp.44.2 °Cn/a
Stability71 %n/a
Graphics Test21 fpsn/a
Graphics Score3635n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 6 GB 2 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5 LPDDR3
Memory Frequency 3200 MHz n/a
Channels 4 1
Storage
Storage Capacity128 GB32 GB
Storage TypeUFS 3.1eMMC 5.1
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 14)
OS Size 21 GB n/a
UI Skin HyperOS 1.0 One UI 6

Battery

Volume 8840 mAh 5100 mAh
Max Charging Power 33 W 15 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-ion
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes (38% in 30 min) Yes
Full Charge Time 1:30 h 3:40 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Xiaomi Pad 6
26:37
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
22:07
Web Browsing10:22 h08:08 h
Video Playback14:17 h11:55 h
Games06:47 h04:59 h
Standby Mode139 h121 h

Main camera

Matrix 13 MP 8 MP
Zoom Digital n/a
Flash Dual LED No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion 120 fps (720p) No
Lenses count Standard: 13 MP Standard: 8 MP
Features
Main lens
Matrix13 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.2n/a
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 2 MP
Aperture f/2.2 n/a
Sensor n/a CMOS
Sensor size 1/4.0" n/a
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 720p at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS n/a - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
NFC* No No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*n/a1
SIM TypeNoNano
eSIM Support *n/aNo
Hybrid Slotn/aNo
5G Supportn/aNo

Sound

Speakers 4.0 Stereo
3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Xiaomi Pad 6
88.1 dB
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
85.5 dB

Other

Class Mid-range Budget
Announced April, 2023 yr May, 2021 yr
Release Date April, 2023 yr June, 2021 yr
Launch Price ($) n/a 160
Sensors - Hall Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Accelerometer
- Compass
Charger Included Yes 33 W Yes 8 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 6 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below