Xiaomi Pad 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Pad 6 Manufactured in April, 2023, with display 11 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 870, vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A9, Manufactured in October, 2023with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 6
- Larger display: 11in
- Higher pixel density: 309ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 8840mAh vs 5100mAh
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
- Lighter design: 333g vs 490g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.2
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11 in | 8.7 in |
| Resolution | 1800x2880 pixels | 800x1340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 5:3 |
| Pixel density | 309 ppi | 179 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 550 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.6 % | 81.9 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 97 % | 81.2 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 181600 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 26 ms | 44 ms |
| Contrast | 832:1 | 1389:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 253.95 mm (10 in) | 211 mm (8.31 in) |
| Width | 165.18 mm (6.5 in) | 124.7 mm (4.91 in) |
| Thickness | 6.51 mm (0.26 in) | 8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 490 g (17.28 oz) | 333 g (11.75 oz) |
| Area | 419 cm² (64.95 in²) | 263 cm² (40.77 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gold - Blue |
- Silver - Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Max Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)) - 1/3.2 (Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 698 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 650 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 670 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1029.1 GFLOPS | 128 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1335 | 738 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3584 | 2025 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 3371 | 1262 |
| CPU | 219811 | 98658 |
| GPU | 277960 | 51808 |
| Memory | 129368 | 85127 |
| UX | 199071 | 65871 |
| NanoReview Score | 826210 | 301464 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 44.2 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 71 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 21 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 3635 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 13 |
| OS Size | 21 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | One UI 5.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 8840 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (38% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 60 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:30 h | 2:30 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:22 h | 09:48 h |
| Video Playback | 14:17 h | 14:41 h |
| Games | 06:47 h | 05:35 h |
| Standby Mode | 139 h | 132 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 2 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | n/a | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | n/a | 1 |
| SIM Type | No | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900) |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B66) |
| 5G Support | n/a | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | April, 2023 yr | October, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2023 yr | October, 2023 yr |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 6 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0