Xiaomi Pad 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024)
66
out 100
VS
54
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Pad 6 Manufactured in April, 2023, with display 11 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 870, vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024), Manufactured in March, 2024with chipsetSamsung Exynos 1280. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 6
- Larger display: 11in
- Higher pixel density: 309ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 8840mAh vs 7040mAh
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024)
- Lighter design: 465g vs 490g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.2
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11 in | 10.4 in |
| Resolution | 1800x2880 pixels | 1200x2000 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 5:3 |
| Pixel density | 309 ppi | 224 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 550 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.6 % | 81.6 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 97 % | 92.5 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 181600 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 26 ms | 32 ms |
| Contrast | 832:1 | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 253.95 mm (10 in) | 244.5 mm (9.63 in) |
| Width | 165.18 mm (6.5 in) | 154.3 mm (6.07 in) |
| Thickness | 6.51 mm (0.26 in) | 7 mm (0.28 in) |
| Weight | 490 g (17.28 oz) | 465 g (16.4 oz) |
| Area | 419 cm² (64.95 in²) | 377 cm² (58.44 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gold - Blue |
- Gray - Green - Rose Gold |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | Samsung Exynos 1280 |
| Max Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)) - 1/3.2 (Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 698 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 650 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 670 MHz | 897 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1029.1 GFLOPS | 229.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1335 | 979 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3584 | 2029 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 3371 | n/a |
| CPU | 219811 | 157902 |
| GPU | 277960 | 99310 |
| Memory | 129368 | 92699 |
| UX | 199071 | 119702 |
| NanoReview Score | 826210 | 469613 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 44.2 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 71 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 21 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 3635 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 14 |
| OS Size | 21 GB | 16 GB |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | OneUI 6.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 8840 mAh | 7040 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (38% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 70 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:30 h | 2:45 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:22 h | 08:57 h |
| Video Playback | 14:17 h | 14:20 h |
| Games | 06:47 h | 05:24 h |
| Standby Mode | 139 h | 134 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.9 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | 1/5.0" |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | n/a | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | n/a | 1 |
| SIM Type | No | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | n/a | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | April, 2023 yr | March, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2023 yr | March, 2024 yr |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | Yes 8 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 6 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
