Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 Manufactured in February, 2024, with display 12.4 with chipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 2, vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE, Manufactured in September, 2023with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4
- Larger display: 12.4in
- Higher pixel density: 295ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 10000mAh vs 8000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
- Lighter design: 478g vs 590g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.4 in | 11 in |
| Resolution | 2032x3048 pixels | 1200x1920 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 295 ppi | 207 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-144 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 900 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.8 % | 82.2 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 93.1 % |
| Response time | n/a | 37 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 1689:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 278.7 mm (10.97 in) | 255.53 mm (10.06 in) |
| Width | 191.58 mm (7.54 in) | 167.08 mm (6.58 in) |
| Thickness | 6.26 mm (0.25 in) | 7.36 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 590 g (20.81 oz) | 478 g (16.86 oz) |
| Area | 534 cm² (82.77 in²) | 427 cm² (66.19 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Green |
- Gray - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
| Max Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 3/2 (Cortex-A510) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A710) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.2 (Cortex-X3) |
- 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Adreno 740 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2089 GFLOPS | 284 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1942 | 412 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5624 | 1423 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 8800 | 348 |
| CPU | 360581 | 91109 |
| GPU | 545348 | 40869 |
| Memory | 334036 | 68964 |
| UX | 289730 | 78274 |
| NanoReview Score | 1529695 | 279216 |
| Writing score | n/a | 9238 |
| Web score | n/a | 6619 |
| Video editing | n/a | 3677 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 5908 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 6945 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 13 |
| OS Size | n/a | 22 GB |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 10000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 120 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (88% in 30 min) | Yes (24% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:38 h | 2:45 h |
| Web Browsing | 06:54 h | 10:41 h |
| Video Playback | 09:32 h | 12:28 h |
| Games | 06:50 h | 06:20 h |
| Standby Mode | 171 h | 183 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | n/a |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV32D | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" | 1/5.0" |
| Pixel size | 0.61 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes DP 1.2 | No |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | n/a | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Budget |
| Announced | February, 2024 yr | August, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2024 yr | September, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 249 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Accelerometer |
| Charger Included | Yes 120 W | Yes 18 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0