Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro vs Honor Pad X7
81
out 100
VS
53
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 11.2 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, vs Honor Pad X7, Manufactured in July, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
- Larger display: 11.2in
- Higher pixel density: 344ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 8850mAh vs 7020mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Honor Pad X7
- Lighter design: 365g vs 500g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.2 in | 8.7 in |
| Resolution | 2136x3200 pixels | 800x1340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 5:3 |
| Pixel density | 344 ppi | 179 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Max brightness | 800 nits | 625 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7 % | 81.5 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 99.3 % | n/a |
| Response time | 27 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1338:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 251.22 mm (9.89 in) | 211.8 mm (8.34 in) |
| Width | 173.42 mm (6.83 in) | 124.8 mm (4.91 in) |
| Thickness | 6.18 mm (0.24 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 500 g (17.64 oz) | 365 g (12.87 oz) |
| Area | 436 cm² (67.58 in²) | 264 cm² (40.92 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Green |
Gray |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
| Max Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 3/2 (Cortex-A520) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Adreno 735 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 768 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 1689.6 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2013 | 407 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5472 | 1309 |
| CPU | 373597 | 849957 |
| GPU | 472024 | 978432 |
| Memory | 235412 | 398278 |
| UX | 262182 | 591323 |
| NanoReview Score | 1343215 | 2817990 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | n/a |
| Memory Card | n/a | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 32 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 8850 mAh | 7020 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 67 W | 10 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (40% in 20 min) | No |
| Full Charge Time | 1:10 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | n/a | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32D | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.61 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
Accelerometer |
| Charger Included | Yes 67 W | Yes, 10 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
