Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco Pad X1

Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra Manufactured in May, 2025, with display 14 with chipsetXiaomi Xring O1, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad X1, Manufactured in November, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
  • Larger display: 14in
  • Higher battery capacity: 12000mAh vs 8850mAh
  • Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
  • Higher pixel density: 344ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Lighter design: 500g vs 609g
  • Supports Dolby Atmos

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 8/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type OLED IPS LCD
Size 14 in 11.2 in
Resolution 2136x3200 pixels 2136x3200 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 3:2
Pixel density 275 ppi 344 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes n/a
Max brightness n/a 800 nits
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate 360 Hz 360 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 92 % 85.7 %
Features DCI-P3 DCI-P3

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 305.82 mm (12.04 in) 251.22 mm (9.89 in)
Width 207.47 mm (8.17 in) 173.42 mm (6.83 in)
Thickness 5.1 mm (0.2 in) 6.18 mm (0.24 in)
Weight 609 g (21.48 oz) 500 g (17.64 oz)
Area 634 cm² (98.27 in²) 436 cm² (67.58 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Gray
- Blue
- Gray
- Blue
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button No
Screen-to-body ratio
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
92 %
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
85.7 %

Performance

Testing Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Xiaomi Xring O1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3
Max Frequency 3900 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU Cores 10 (2 + 4 + 2 + 2) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A520)
- 2/1.9 (Cortex-A725)
- 4/3.4 (Cortex-A725)
- 2/3.9 (Cortex-X925)
- 3/1.9 (Cortex-A520)
- 4/2.6 (Cortex-A720)
- 1/2.8 (Cortex-X4)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Yes Yes
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 Adreno 732
GPU Cores 2048 768
GPU Frequency 1392 MHz 950 MHz
FLOPS 5701.6 GFLOPS 1459.2 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
2737
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
1873
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
9191
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
5149
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)27371873
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)91915149
Geekbench Compute (GPU)20977n/a
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
2666674
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
n/a
CPU658893365078
GPU1069048467273
Memory552710309615
UX386023239702
NanoReview Score2666674n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 4800 MHz n/a
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.1UFS 4.0
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 15 Android 15
UI Skin HyperOS 2.0 HyperOS 2.0

Battery

Volume 12000 mAh 8850 mAh
Max Charging Power 120 W 45 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging Yes No
Fast Charging Yes Yes (50% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time n/a 1:20 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 13 MP
Photo resolution n/a 4160x3120 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP Standard: 13 MP
Features Bokeh effect
Main lens
Matrix50 MP13 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/2.2
SensorSamsung S5KJN1Omnivision OV13B10
Sensor size1/2.76"1/3.06 (0.33)
Pixel size0.64 μm1.12 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 8 MP
Matrix n/a 3264x2448 pixels
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.3
Sensor Omnivision OV32D Omnivision OV08D10
Sensor size 1/3.6" 1/4.0 (0.25)
Pixel size 0.61 μm 1.12 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
NFC* No Yes
Infrared Port Yes Yes
Connectivity
SIM TypeNoNo
eSIM Support *NoNo
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

Speakers 8.0 4.0
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos n/a Yes

Other

Class Flagship Mid-range
Announced May, 2025 yr November, 2025 yr
Release Date May, 2025 yr November, 2025 yr
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
Charger Included Yes 120 W Yes, 45 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below